Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?

If you want to know the community’s opinion about a topic, make a poll here.

Moderator: Game Masters

Agree that Royal plates should get +3 resist per part?

Yes
46
82%
No
10
18%
 
Total votes: 56

User avatar
Quintoz
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?

Post by Quintoz »

If you choose to restrict it, I do hope that their will be something else they can use.
I've wasted 150 auro ores on plate and I only got a gorget for that.
Image

Stop the cuckening on Pang #MakePangGreat
Sherrod
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:54 pm

Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?

Post by Sherrod »

He meant make it so they cant wear bone armour.
Image
Made by Adrian
User avatar
Quintoz
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?

Post by Quintoz »

YOU SERIOUS!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?.
Read again without fail.
Image

Stop the cuckening on Pang #MakePangGreat
Sherrod
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:54 pm

Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?

Post by Sherrod »

Obviously there will be a substitute for elemental resist
Image
Made by Adrian
User avatar
Maximilian Lhoth
Posts: 2871
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:05 am
Location: 378093000
Contact:

Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?

Post by Maximilian Lhoth »

Alteran wrote:just restrict priest and knight from bone armour ?.

Alteran
Rather BARBARIAN and priest from METAL armour =)

This way a rich knight can be better in the full auro plates or dskull plates than a poor barbarian in elite vampires or phoenix/invul bones.
User avatar
Dyne
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?

Post by Dyne »

Maximilian Lhoth wrote:
Alteran wrote:just restrict priest and knight from bone armour ?.

Alteran
Rather BARBARIAN and priest from METAL armour =)
And here I was going to suggest Barbarians should be able to Wear a Chain Chest piece as well. :mrgreen:
User avatar
Maximilian Lhoth
Posts: 2871
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:05 am
Location: 378093000
Contact:

Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?

Post by Maximilian Lhoth »

Dyne wrote:
Maximilian Lhoth wrote:
Alteran wrote:just restrict priest and knight from bone armour ?.

Alteran
Rather BARBARIAN and priest from METAL armour =)
And here I was going to suggest Barbarians should be able to Wear a Chain Chest piece as well. :mrgreen:
Heh, I dunno, I think baba and priest are the good ones and the knight is the bad one. And not too many PvP in full dskull plates really, anyway. So let's make knight "the necro of the fighters" - expensive but good, if you are rich you can be awesome, if you are poor you better be a barbarian. Baba gets 35 more STR, better statcap, 100 vs 85 tactics. Knight having... 20ish more max AR if using exc dskull vs exc phoenix doesn't sound too bad. And PvM.. well, doesn't matter, knights can get their auro platesets, babas can still get their cloud giant sets.

Or both can just use vampire, giving the average joe baba advantage over the average joe knight.

Poor barbarian:
more str
more tactics
more stats
cheap PvM armors
somewhat cheap PvP armors

Poor knight:
less str
less tactics
less stats
cheap PvM armors
somewhat cheap PvP armors

And the rich knight will have the advantage of auropian plates and dskull plates, if the knight is really rich.
Last edited by Maximilian Lhoth on Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Quintoz
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?

Post by Quintoz »

I think armor restriction is fine, don't go nerfing baba.
We get smacked around by a good priest anyway in pvp.
Image

Stop the cuckening on Pang #MakePangGreat
Post Reply