Page 4 of 4
Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:51 pm
by Quintoz
If you choose to restrict it, I do hope that their will be something else they can use.
I've wasted 150 auro ores on plate and I only got a gorget for that.
Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:11 pm
by Sherrod
He meant make it so they cant wear bone armour.
Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:13 pm
by Quintoz
YOU SERIOUS!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?.
Read again without fail.
Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:16 pm
by Sherrod
Obviously there will be a substitute for elemental resist
Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:17 am
by Maximilian Lhoth
Alteran wrote:just restrict priest and knight from bone armour ?.
Alteran
Rather BARBARIAN and priest from METAL armour =)
This way a rich knight can be better in the full auro plates or dskull plates than a poor barbarian in elite vampires or phoenix/invul bones.
Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:20 am
by Dyne
Maximilian Lhoth wrote:Alteran wrote:just restrict priest and knight from bone armour ?.
Alteran
Rather BARBARIAN and priest from METAL armour =)
And here I was going to suggest Barbarians should be able to Wear a Chain Chest piece as well.
Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:29 am
by Maximilian Lhoth
Dyne wrote:Maximilian Lhoth wrote:Alteran wrote:just restrict priest and knight from bone armour ?.
Alteran
Rather BARBARIAN and priest from METAL armour =)
And here I was going to suggest Barbarians should be able to Wear a Chain Chest piece as well. :mrgreen:
Heh, I dunno, I think baba and priest are the good ones and the knight is the bad one. And not too many PvP in full dskull plates really, anyway. So let's make knight "the necro of the fighters" - expensive but good, if you are rich you can be awesome, if you are poor you better be a barbarian. Baba gets 35 more STR, better statcap, 100 vs 85 tactics. Knight having... 20ish more max AR if using exc dskull vs exc phoenix doesn't sound too bad. And PvM.. well, doesn't matter, knights can get their auro platesets, babas can still get their cloud giant sets.
Or both can just use vampire, giving the average joe baba advantage over the average joe knight.
Poor barbarian:
more str
more tactics
more stats
cheap PvM armors
somewhat cheap PvP armors
Poor knight:
less str
less tactics
less stats
cheap PvM armors
somewhat cheap PvP armors
And the rich knight will have the advantage of auropian plates and dskull plates, if the knight is really rich.
Re: Agree that Royal ORE should be boosted to +3 per part?
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:30 am
by Quintoz
I think armor restriction is fine, don't go nerfing baba.
We get smacked around by a good priest anyway in pvp.