Pangaea-world.dk

Recalling not a good idea on a knight.

Talerco Pious wrote:

Biggs wrote:Tissues are for when aileth goes to sleep early?

Or when his eyes get distracted by the animegirl at the left screen

It's for masturbation! /Cpt. Obvious

Boris wrote:

xHarlequinx wrote:Imperial Trinsic Themesong

What I expected:
What my religion expected:
What we got:

- Boris

That hurts :C

The siege system is working quite well, now we have to address the issues that it has brought up. I think this thread has served its purpose.
Thought about getting in to this "put it on the table and lets see!"-contest but its not worth it.

From what I understand from Kerbal's original post, this is about survivability - not really what PvP is or should be. In case of Knights, even a damage reduce of -40% makes a difference. In case of max. STR + jewerly + bless, they should have their STR around 180(+). So if 4x Veritas was enough be...

I'm liking this. ^

It still could be as simple as making relatively useless material useful. For example the following materials would be simply -3 dmg vs. spiritual damage. Valorite ore Gargoyle bone Nightmare hide So in case of Knight/Rangers it could be up to... 7 parts x -3dmg = -21dmg from rites + shoes + leggig...

No hijacking thread here, keep it at the religion vs religion. We can talk about necromancers in a different thread.

Zaradon wrote:Ranger are told to do great damage with 40 piety and bows.

My suggestion would be;
Lower Veritas requirement to Knight/Ranger.
make knights immune to squelch effect.

In my opinion we do not need veritas for more classes, we need to tone it down for the ones that have it.

After doing a bit of the siege in Trinsic and the defense in Occlo current pvp for a knight is very boring. So this is veritas from a knight's perspective and I wish other religion knights would give their views as well to get a overall feel. This is not a whine about the class sucking balls. I thin...