Robber Status

[Ivan]

Perhaps add it to .options menu and make it so that it could be change on/off only once per week etc.

Just as a reminder .robber tags only purpose is stop tekstone from helping robbers and to actualy be able to list current robbers. You are not allowed to rob without the tag, and with the tag you cannot assist tekstone and way around.

EDIT: Disable this option while stoned ofcourse.

[Johnny Walac]

Perhaps add it to .options menu and make it so that it could be change on/off only once per week etc.

Just as a reminder .robber tags only purpose is stop tekstone from helping robbers and to actualy be able to list current robbers. You are not allowed to rob without the tag, and with the tag you cannot assist tekstone and way around.

Too easy imo.

The point with my thread was that:

The staff is probably gonna stick with the current .robber rule.
"Get blue, get Law to remove it"

But that is such a big change from the original .robber rule so the staff should ask the .robber if they wanna stay .robber with the new rule. Or become normal red.

I do agree that becoming blue to get Law removing it is to much. But thats for another Idea thread.

[Orin]

as much as i hate to agree with Johnny over anything it is true that .robber according to recent events will be removed with Laws salvation rite and we have already had a case where one player intended to become a robber but was still blue and had no murder counts so it was a simple thing to have his .robber removed.

But for the rest i do agree with johnny that as far as RP reasons go i can see a red not wanting to got to Law to have the .robber removed so if it means anything i agree with johnny on this, but i would say any one afterwards is stuck with it.

[Johnny Walac]

so if it means anything i agree with johnny on this, but i would say any one afterwards is stuck with it.

Aye this. Now that it's official, if you become a robber. You gotta go with the program. But for us that joined under totally different circumstances should be able to decide ourself.

[Ivan]

If all classes would be balanced to equal level i would see some sense in all these changes, but the fact is they are not and this is ridicilious. Simply having no religion to help makes it impossible to even fight against religions thus forcing robbers to bullshit asshole gameplay style of rob-gate-log. And all of you people on the shard like having no chance of retrieving your gear or ever getting your revenge correct?

[Mike]

If all classes would be balanced to equal level i would see some sense in all these changes, but the fact is they are not and this is ridicilious. Simply having no religion to help makes it impossible to even fight against religions thus forcing robbers to bullshit asshole gameplay style of rob-gate-log. And all of you people on the shard like having no chance of retrieving your gear or ever getting your revenge correct?

This topic is just about one thing, robber status alternatives for pre-law requirement robbers. Don't derail the thread.

[Bipina Huntley]

I agree with johnny tbh. I remember when one of GM's said that .robber status will be easy to remove, and no one mentioned anything about removing it will need LAW's salvation. If red character dont want to be robber anymore (but he still want to be bad guy/still be red) he should recive his salvation from GM like they mentioned before. Trial is for people who dont wanna be bad guys anymore and they will follow rules of lord british as fair citizens (as far as i remember). If GM's want to make update in this rule, actuall robbers should have opportunity to decide if they wanna rob or help religions. which simply mean if they want to keep this status or remove it.

[Mag'etherian]

Okay so... we're talking robber status and other things here. I do remember Telborea changing between two guilds, same chars... one week they'd go robber guild, the next they would force punish crimes of people playing the game, claiming land as their own.

When robber status was implamented, I do believe everyone was warned that they could choose to continue staying a robber and get a .robber status, or rob no-more. Now you want to do both again or am I missing something?

[Quintoz]

Okay so... we're talking robber status and other things here. I do remember Telborea changing between two guilds, same chars... one week they'd go robber guild, the next they would force punish crimes of people playing the game, claiming land as their own.

When robber status was implamented, I do believe everyone was warned that they could choose to continue staying a robber and get a .robber status, or rob no-more. Now you want to do both again or am I missing something?

You're missing it all I think since your first part is wrong.
For your second part which is asked with wrong information I can say this. All Johnny wants is the choice (ONE TIME ONLY) between .robber or not becouse the rules were changed between now and then.
When most people made the choice to go robber with the .robber status we was told like Johnny stated in his first post "If you no longer want to be a robber, okay, we take the tag away. It's permanent, but can be removed." Now we have to go to Law and become blues before it goes away and with that information some may want to get rid of robber status.

[Mag'etherian]

I expected Quintoz to reply to me here so here it is... I'm not wrong in anything I said Quintard. You play a robber, or you don't. Simply put. The only difference now is you need to live a peaceful life to have robber tag removed by Law, which is less GM intervention... which you all wanted anyways right? I know 100% from previous posts in many threads that's what you's wanted, now here it is and you's are furious. I for one am glad it's become more player interactive. If you want a free switch, forget it. Nothing in life is free. Live with it.