Timestamps? Doesnt Laws salva rite say when did you kill the poor person or im totally wrong?Ares wrote:Instead of just bitching and moaning, why don't you come up with a suggestion that creates a fair compromise for everyone? We're not just going to salvate 1 player because we feel bad for him. That would be completely unfair.Ares wrote: there are no logs over the salvations nor timestamps on the MC's.
We're not trying to force anyone or be assholes, I'm annoyed that you hint that. You should know better. We're concerned with making a fair mechanism that favours everyone in the future as well.
Salvation updates
Moderator: Game Masters
Re: Salvation updates
- Johnny Walac
- Posts: 4503
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:05 pm
- Location: Sweden
Re: Salvation updates
Salvation has existed forever correct? So when the player killed countless of players before he knew exactly what he was doing and the prices he will have to pay incase he wanna go blue.
I don't see a need for a change.
I don't see a need for a change.
Re: Salvation updates
It does? I take it back then. It didn't seem like there was a time saved when I was working with it last time.Simmo wrote:Timestamps? Doesnt Laws salva rite say when did you kill the poor person or im totally wrong?Ares wrote:Instead of just bitching and moaning, why don't you come up with a suggestion that creates a fair compromise for everyone? We're not just going to salvate 1 player because we feel bad for him. That would be completely unfair.Ares wrote: there are no logs over the salvations nor timestamps on the MC's.
We're not trying to force anyone or be assholes, I'm annoyed that you hint that. You should know better. We're concerned with making a fair mechanism that favours everyone in the future as well.
Re: Salvation updates
The first and second add up giving it a win. And if you look at the posts, many players changed their opinion after voting, and Boris influenced the third one highly.Monad wrote:Reminder http://www.knoechel.dk/pangaea/viewtopi ... 19&t=10189
ICQ: 621133872
Re: Salvation updates
The 360 days option was on there but pretty soon it was evident that voting for it would do nothing since it wouldn't happen anyway.Palma wrote:The first and second add up giving it a win. And if you look at the posts, many players changed their opinion after voting, and Boris influenced the third one highly.Monad wrote:Reminder http://www.knoechel.dk/pangaea/viewtopi ... 19&t=10189
"last i knew it was illegal to hate someone" Richard Mota
Re: Salvation updates
Globally the best option is in use.
- Boris
- Boris
Leather armor is best for sneaking, because it's literally made from hide.
Re: Salvation updates
You are right, I am wrong. It saves the time when the victim was last killed by the red player. My badSimmo wrote:Timestamps? Doesnt Laws salva rite say when did you kill the poor person or im totally wrong?Ares wrote:Instead of just bitching and moaning, why don't you come up with a suggestion that creates a fair compromise for everyone? We're not just going to salvate 1 player because we feel bad for him. That would be completely unfair.Ares wrote: there are no logs over the salvations nor timestamps on the MC's.
We're not trying to force anyone or be assholes, I'm annoyed that you hint that. You should know better. We're concerned with making a fair mechanism that favours everyone in the future as well.
Re: Salvation updates
does that mean we can wipe off old MC's if they have already been paid for and fogiven?Ares wrote:You are right, I am wrong. It saves the time when the victim was last killed by the red player. My bad
Re: Salvation updates
Not retroactively since we have no logs of who was salvated and when. This will only be in effect in salvations from now on.Akkarrin wrote:does that mean we can wipe off old MC's if they have already been paid for and fogiven?Ares wrote:You are right, I am wrong. It saves the time when the victim was last killed by the red player. My bad