About the latest rule changes

[Jyrgen]

Absolutely, at least the way I see it, it was always the distinct advantage of druid/necro spells, not a bug or anything.

[Boris]

So instead you just don't whisper them?

- Boris

[Masano]

I think what he means is that losing the ability to hide the spell you are casting from those( more than a few tiles away) is a nerf so there should be some compensation.

[Shalinn]

I think what he means is that losing the ability to hide the spell you are casting from those( more than a few tiles away) is a nerf so there should be some compensation.

i agree with this

[Boris]

It's illegal and has been illegal, so why should there be a compensation?

I can adjust the rule to "if the RP has already been introduced, silent casting is legal" but that's the only case.

- Boris

[Jyrgen]

Oh right, never knew it was illegal. But that change would be nice actually.

[Glarundis]

that's why i think it would be a nice thing if 115/115 could use those (a script or some way perhaps?).
ofc, only after rp has been done. before that, it doesn't even make any sense

[Boris]

It's not a matter of skill, it's a matter of *starts casting an attack spell* "Hi, this is a robbery" and the victim has no clue. But if the RP is already done, then it don't matter.

- Boris

[Hilda]

It's not a matter of skill, it's a matter of *starts casting an attack spell* "Hi, this is a robbery" and the victim has no clue. But if the RP is already done, then it don't matter.

- Boris

Oh, that's fine then and I understand why you put the rule now.

[Dalton]

It's illegal and has been illegal, so why should there be a compensation?

I can adjust the rule to "if the RP has already been introduced, silent casting is legal" but that's the only case.

- Boris

This adjustment looks good actually!