Let's extend full looting to all voluntary battles, not just the Law-Tek associated voluntary battles.
To make the fight voluntary, you speech-RP it before the battle.
An example:
Matti (bloodthirsty baba) from the guild "Evil Men in Black Clothes" decides he wants to kill Nature's emissaries. He has his unguilded friends Juha (antisocial bard who enjoys violence), Jori (shadow druid who hates humanity).
Ulf, a valiant barbarian who fights for all good, is alerted and rides to Yew. Ulf tells the nasties: "I will fight to defend the altar of Nature. Just wait until I get my friends here as I alone cannot fight you all." Ulf quickly runs to the Yew centre where he starts pigeoning other "good aligned" PvP'ers to participate. A friendly druid, Jorma, gates Bertil the 175 str baba and Aarne the 85 pozang archer to Yew centre. There the druid blesses all three fighters and shoots curses to the enemies. The battle begins! Swords & Sorcery! Might meets Magic, Magic meets Might!
-> and drylooting be legal for these people during this fight!
Thumbs up or down? If down, please state why and I try to respond and point out where you failed!
PvP rule extension maybe?
Moderator: Game Masters
- Maximilian Lhoth
- Posts: 2871
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:05 am
- Location: 378093000
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:51 pm
Re: PvP rule extension maybe?
Kent Strider wrote:Just go back to Lorendia, it pwnz Pang roight?
Re: PvP rule extension maybe?
hahahahahahahahahahha :D:John Longfall wrote:Kent Strider wrote:Just go back to Lorendia, it pwnz Pang roight?
- Maximilian Lhoth
- Posts: 2871
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:05 am
- Location: 378093000
- Contact:
Re: PvP rule extension maybe?
Cannot get my PvP there either. And sorry, the legendary Russian PK Shard is not an option.Kent Strider wrote:Just go back to Lorendia, it pwnz Pang roight?
Re: PvP rule extension maybe?
Hehe, well it isn't a bad rule. I like it, but I guess this would put robbers in the same position?
- Maximilian Lhoth
- Posts: 2871
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:05 am
- Location: 378093000
- Contact:
Re: PvP rule extension maybe?
I thought mostly of town and temple defense situations only, not battles occurring in the wilderness, as in, if someone decides to fight the robber instead of fleeing it's still robbery situation, not "voluntary".Kent Strider wrote:Hehe, well it isn't a bad rule. I like it, but I guess this would put robbers in the same position?
Basically I would like to see Law vs Tek style activity also without guild/religion tags.
(What comes to robbery rules and how I personally think they should be extended, everyone already knows and it's whole another topic)
The playerbase is smallish, PvP scene is smaller, they know each other and they know what each other want, and to avoid misunderstandings there's the simple trick of keeping looted items in a separate bag for a certain time.