Page 1 of 6
New Robber Rule.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:09 pm
by Johnny Walac
Simply.
If I got SS proving a person has run away from a robbery twice, without roleplay. The robber should be allowed to attack on sight (On that person)
Why would the robber be so stupid and stop to say something when he knows the person will make a run for it like he always does?
Re: New Robber Rule.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:57 pm
by Boris
What is the timeframe between those two encounters?
- Boris
Re: New Robber Rule.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:10 pm
by Dista
If they run away three times consecutively with absolutely no RP (no attempt to stop, doesn't even rp a terrified person running away) then I agree with this.
IF You do not have the time to stop (for example: if you're running to log out and get killed) it is excusable,
If you have the time and choose not too, then I agree.
Re: New Robber Rule.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:11 pm
by Johnny Walac
Boris wrote:What is the timeframe between those two encounters?
- Boris
Do you mean for example that the SS can't be on the same day. And the SS can't be several months between eachother.
The SS can be taken at any robbery. Which means if the robbery encounters the victim twice on the same day and the victim runs twice without RP on the same day. The SS are valid.
However.
If there is 2 months between the SS, it is not valid. The person might have changed in that timeframe.
Re: New Robber Rule.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:31 pm
by Simmo
Rincoe wrote:
IF You do not have the time to stop (for example: if you're running to log out and get killed) it is excusable,
If you have the time and choose not too, then I agree.
Then probably everyone says that i had to run and log out. I was in hurry, Johnny was after me, i died i told him in icq that im in hurry, he ressed me and i logged out.
Easy at it is.
Re: New Robber Rule.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:34 pm
by Johnny Walac
Simmo wrote:Rincoe wrote:
IF You do not have the time to stop (for example: if you're running to log out and get killed) it is excusable,
If you have the time and choose not too, then I agree.
Then probably everyone says that i had to run and log out. I was in hurry, Johnny was after me, i died i told him in icq that im in hurry, he ressed me and i logged out.
Easy at it is.
Did you lie to me Simmo? :O
Re: New Robber Rule.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:36 pm
by Simmo
Noo! I was in a hurry. Had brother visiting me.
Re: New Robber Rule.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:37 pm
by Johnny Walac
Simmo wrote:Noo! I was in a hurry. Had brother visiting me.
They all say that...
Re: New Robber Rule.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:41 pm
by Dista
Re: New Robber Rule.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:41 pm
by Simmo
Awh i cought myself here. But i had nothing against that, was fun. Tho i want my spear back.
