yup, read it.
i need to check some other places to understand why is the boson of higgs required for particles to have matter, and how does it work?
is it like, the only particle in the universe that has matter is the boson of higgs, and every other particle simply "eats" a lot of those bosons?
so while for years we say that something has matter we should say that, it's something that has a lot of tiny particles called bosons of higgs which have, in their turn, matter.
i think it's something like this from a bit what I read, I just don't know if after this process the boson "joins" the other particle, or it simply gets annihilated and something even more different and smaller than the boson itself (the matter) becomes part of the other particle.
this is strange, because we don't even know why would particles have matter (or for that matter, why wouldn't particles have matter
) but from what i read, the boson needs to exist (in the "pattern model" or whatever it's called in english) for particles to have matter, because everything else in that theory doesn't required particles to have matter. but we know that they do.
anyways, i'll be gone, will come back the 14th of august.
i'll leave a new discussion for people like timujin to talk about.
what would be better. to solve this financial problem (note, not the crisis, but the problem with the system itself, which, in some moments of history, manifests into crisis) by developing what we have, or to put a bomb in every bank that holds or produces money, currency, paper-money, whatever, you know what I mean, and to start from scratch with a total different system. central european bank and us federal reserve being a must to blow up
note: this new system doesn't necessarily have to be something opposed to capitalism (but but surely opposed to how capitalism is right now), it would just not be a financial-based economy as it is now.
so what do you prefer?bombs or no bombs?
