Old piety system

[Biggs]

Theres no point with 65 med haha!
Like i said rid religion of piety make it fixed damage / bless possibly on med skill or class, and why does head have to be priest? my idea is so all classes currently recieving piety will be on a level playing field priest wont be the tanks and best healers, other classes can be made usefull if piety is not involved.

[Biggs]

Heres how i believe it should of worked from the start;

MONK (true caster): Best healer on self/target, best at damage rite, decent stat/object bless

PRIEST (the blesser/fighter): Poor healing rite, decent at damage rite, best at stat/object blessing on self and target

KNIGHT (true fighter class): decent healing rite(self only), decent at damage rite, poor stat/object blessing if at all

This would even up the playing field in my eyes and it makes so much more sense. (Blesses/healing on others are oviously weakend same as current system)

If you wondering about Warrior ranger fack knows lol.

[Glarundis]

biggs idea is not bad, but i would give more healing to priest and less healing to monk.
still, monk would have more rite dmg

[Biggs]

biggs idea is not bad, but i would give more healing to priest and less healing to monk.
still, monk would have more rite dmg

why priests can heal them selfs perfectly well.... and with a decent (not best) healing rite they wouldnt suffer, the reason i suggest monks have best healing and damage rite is because they are not run in and wack class they are stand back spam rites / spells

[Mackean]

rping in hope that the gms see you and give you extra piety reminds me of politics for some odd reason

boy do i love politics....... not <<<< that was in a borat voice just so you know ....... fml

[Biggs]

oh there watching mark my words!