You are now dead to me.Simmo wrote:Boris vs Ares, Monad
Who has bigger power scale!
But i like Dot also, no spamm.
Warrior's new abilities
Moderator: Game Masters
Re: Warrior's new abilities
- Darian Darkmind
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:58 pm
Re: Warrior's new abilities
For the first time you were actually funny. Congrats.Boris wrote:The moment we have 10 skills to implement, lets do a book. Creating a completely new book with 2-3 skills is as useful as a cock-flavored lollipop. One dot dommand and one new item does the same.
If there's only 2-3 "spells", then definitely a dot command. However, if you're planning to add more in the future, then you might as well start with the book.
Re: Warrior's new abilities
I voted for the book.
What I understood of the idea was something similar to this but working with stamina instead of mana?
What I understood of the idea was something similar to this but working with stamina instead of mana?
Re: Warrior's new abilities
dot commands
i understand the logic of rp, but i don't see the warrior's thing as a spell or something that would require words to be said or something.
that's why i'd rather have the dot command instead of the book. books are for magic and things you have to read.
unless these abilities are none of those, dot command wins (for me)
i understand the logic of rp, but i don't see the warrior's thing as a spell or something that would require words to be said or something.
that's why i'd rather have the dot command instead of the book. books are for magic and things you have to read.
unless these abilities are none of those, dot command wins (for me)
Re: Warrior's new abilities
Book is the same as a tome. You either click the desired spell or shout the powerwords.
Dot command is as simple as a dot command is. Besides a command, there would be an item for a warrior skill (sharpening).
If you vote for book, it's the same thing as voting for Romney.
- Boris
Dot command is as simple as a dot command is. Besides a command, there would be an item for a warrior skill (sharpening).
If you vote for book, it's the same thing as voting for Romney.
- Boris
Leather armor is best for sneaking, because it's literally made from hide.
- Johnny Walac
- Posts: 4503
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:05 pm
- Location: Sweden
Re: Warrior's new abilities
Alright. I wanna go for the book now.Boris wrote:Book is the same as a tome. You either click the desired spell or shout the powerwords.
I wanna see what my enemy does. (Powerwords shouting)
I change my vote to book.
- Darian Darkmind
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:58 pm
Re: Warrior's new abilities
Im with you in this one. I don't want warriors to "cast" anything. They should have moves and skills, but shouldn't be forced to speak any powerwords.Glarundis wrote:dot commands
i understand the logic of rp, but i don't see the warrior's thing as a spell or something that would require words to be said or something.
that's why i'd rather have the dot command instead of the book. books are for magic and things you have to read.
unless these abilities are none of those, dot command wins (for me)
Unless, of course the warriors are all Dragonborns from Skyrim.
Re: Warrior's new abilities
Warriors are not casting anything. The book would be simply a visual interface to the warrior's battle/fighting abilities instead just a dot command.
Re: Warrior's new abilities
Having powerwords for warrior-like moves is too much like Pokemon or something, i.e having to say smth before ya make a special move. Come onAres wrote:Powerwords would be implemented obviously.. The point is that if we ever want to expand it, we have to come up with yet another .dotcommand. Dotcommands suck! Books rock! (more work for scribes too)Johnny Walac wrote:I take it both options are possible as both options are up for poll.
I always prefered .dot commands as I make macros for them.
But in the end both options are okey. But I prefer the .dot one.
Vote Book 2012!
Re: Warrior's new abilities
Never tried Pokemon (I think I'm too old), so I have no idea what you're talking about.Jyrgen wrote:Having powerwords for warrior-like moves is too much like Pokemon or something, i.e having to say smth before ya make a special move. Come onAres wrote:Powerwords would be implemented obviously.. The point is that if we ever want to expand it, we have to come up with yet another .dotcommand. Dotcommands suck! Books rock! (more work for scribes too)Johnny Walac wrote:I take it both options are possible as both options are up for poll.
I always prefered .dot commands as I make macros for them.
But in the end both options are okey. But I prefer the .dot one.
Vote Book 2012!