Ranger vs. Knight

If you want to know the community’s opinion about a topic, make a poll here.

Moderator: Game Masters

Ranger vs. Knight

Ranger
19
48%
Knight
21
53%
 
Total votes: 40

User avatar
Glarundis
Posts: 5741
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Ranger vs. Knight

Post by Glarundis »

yeah you can tank the rest, but at the expense of damaging your armor a lot? :P
User avatar
Evander
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 3:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Ranger vs. Knight

Post by Evander »

Quintoz wrote:Everything except Giants, Voids, Balrons, Lotas and dragons can be tanked with Longsword and shield and longsword has huge dps. I would take that and a real archer instead of a hybrid noob =).
Tanking even shabooli drifter is sometimes impossible. I still prefer 1h hunting, becouse trying to tank is so fun way to play, even with price of easily damaged armors
User avatar
Andoriel
Posts: 492
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:00 am

Re: Ranger vs. Knight

Post by Andoriel »

tanking use to mean something before elemental damage. Nowdays not so much.
Masano
Posts: 776
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:01 am

Re: Ranger vs. Knight

Post by Masano »

Andoriel wrote:tanking use to mean something before elemental damage. Nowdays not so much.
Join nature with Knight, get 30/40 piety, cast that new elemental aura? Might work.


I think Quintoz is partly right, Ranger is a kind of hybrid char that does not excel in either PvP or PvM but that doesnt mean they cant be good. A knight would be better for PvP and an Archer better for bows and PvM...but that doesnt mean that Ranger isnt decent on both those fronts.
Like Boris mentioned Ranger also gets some useful skills such as 85 hiding, GM tracking, 85 animal lore, 40 poisoning. Its skills like those that is why I like my Ranger, it has great versatility and you can play in many different styles.
User avatar
Quintoz
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: Ranger vs. Knight

Post by Quintoz »

Being decent all around isen't a reason to bring a ranger over a knight or an archer or both. The current ranger is like the Tekstone tome it's suppose to be decent in terms of Pvp / PvM and have some RP value but the end result is that it's shit when compared to one that is focused in one area. Some call it "Intresting" the rest of us calls it shit - I feel the same about rangers.

Awesome negotation stone hunter Simmo is awesome.
Image

Stop the cuckening on Pang #MakePangGreat
Arion
Posts: 284
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 3:32 am
Location: USA

Re: Ranger vs. Knight

Post by Arion »

I like the ranger class but using archery with 85 tactics isnt the best. Ive found it almost easier to fight lots of mobs with just sms then archery because the dmg is alot lower or so it seems with 85 tactics. Lets give rangers 100 tactics :twisted:
User avatar
Evander
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 3:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Ranger vs. Knight

Post by Evander »

In my ears ranger sounds great.

-You can have GM swords like knight.
-You can use bows; means you can solo giants easily
-You can use dragons to aid you
-You can use full platesuit as knight to obtain good AR
-You can poison your weapon

Cant say what it is in reality, becouse never plaid one.
User avatar
Boris
Admin
Posts: 6972
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Ranger vs. Knight

Post by Boris »

Eventually a Ranger will do more damage, than an Archer, with a bow.

- Boris
Leather armor is best for sneaking, because it's literally made from hide.
Kent Strider

Re: Ranger vs. Knight

Post by Kent Strider »

I'ma try a ranger :) Deleted my archer!
Xippy
Posts: 486
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:53 am

Re: Ranger vs. Knight

Post by Xippy »

Delete your archer? while can rejoin class and have 100 archer and other 85 tactics,85 healing. Anyway i dont know if your archer were any good.
Post Reply