Malas VS T2A

If you want to know the community’s opinion about a topic, make a poll here.

Moderator: Game Masters

Malas or T2A?

Malas
4
16%
T2A
16
64%
None of them
5
20%
 
Total votes: 25

Kent Strider

Re: Malas VS T2A

Post by Kent Strider »

rofl Flight of the Concords ftw!
User avatar
Boris
Admin
Posts: 6972
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Malas VS T2A

Post by Boris »

Glarundis wrote:At the moment it's like, impossible to conquer any town, isn't it?
It is possible if it fits RP-wise and talked with the staff. Because Imperial guards are friendly vs. everyone, it really doesn't matter who controls and what town. The way I see it, I would start taking over other islands from Occlo to Magincia to whatever and leave the mainland to Lord B. Guardless towns will ofcourse stay guardless.

What comes to T2A and Malas, neither one is coming back unless the playerbase goes up by huge numbers, wich I don't see happening. Both are easy to re-open, it's not about that. It's simply beacuse two worlds are too much for 25~ players.

- Boris
Leather armor is best for sneaking, because it's literally made from hide.
User avatar
Lily Shiar
Posts: 404
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:55 pm
Location: Finland

Re: Malas VS T2A

Post by Lily Shiar »

Boris wrote:
What comes to T2A and Malas, neither one is coming back unless the playerbase goes up by huge numbers, wich I don't see happening. Both are easy to re-open, it's not about that. It's simply beacuse two worlds are too much for 25~ players.

- Boris
I totally agree with Boris, no point to open those with this playerbase. Would be cool to see people around Felucca first :D

But IF we get more players, then I would definitely take T2A back.
I am nobody. Nobody is perfect. Therefore, I must be perfect!
User avatar
Glarundis
Posts: 5741
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Malas VS T2A

Post by Glarundis »

Well, yes, if Imp could have some islands that could be already nice. I think it would be good that it was hard to take a town (to prevent it happening all the time) but it would be doable. So if OoI grew so much in power they should be able to take a lot of towns. The same way, if OoL grew so much in power they should be able to even retake Moonglow and leaving Imperial "homeless"

Or maybe we can make it like, Britain, Trinsic and Moonglow cannot switch sides.
Then you have the guardless cities.
And the others you can capture for your kingdom.
Not that it matters much since everyone can walk there, but hey, atleast we can RP growing our empire hehe
User avatar
Quintoz
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: Malas VS T2A

Post by Quintoz »

Oh yeeeeah not like you just got moonglow for free you want an island too "We are Imperial we so special we want free towns".
If you want a town go get it the old fashioned way and be ready to fight for it.
Image

Stop the cuckening on Pang #MakePangGreat
User avatar
Glarundis
Posts: 5741
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Malas VS T2A

Post by Glarundis »

I know how we got moonglow. I don't expect that we get other towns like that.
The old fashioned way? If I remember right, it takes 2 weeks of constantly keeping the guards out.
Now, 2 weeks is simply impossible, unless you had dozens of members to be constantly rotating while some sleep and the others fight. Now, this for 2 weeks. And, if by any chance, the opposing religion comes in full force (which it will, because 2 weeks is more than enough time) if they so much manage to keep you out for a bit, the guards all respawn, and the timer restarts, so long for your attempt.
Do you think that conquering a town this way is possible to achieve?
Simmo
Posts: 2681
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 4:56 pm

Re: Malas VS T2A

Post by Simmo »

Quintoz wrote:Oh yeeeeah not like you just got moonglow for free you want an island too "We are Imperial we so special we want free towns".
If you want a town go get it the old fashioned way and be ready to fight for it.
I r Nature, i special i want more forest with fences. Could u give me some?
User avatar
Tyrion
Posts: 2787
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 1:58 am

Re: Malas VS T2A

Post by Tyrion »

Glarundis wrote:None.
Let the playerbase grow to 70, and if it happens, we'll think about it.
Agreed. There are A LOT of 24 hour updates that could be made to sustain a healthy player-base. 3 - 17 people does not qualify. But if we did have the player-base I would say Malas. T2A had always been buggy (moreso x10 then Malas) and admin never had a scriptor capable of fixing the issues there.
User avatar
Boris
Admin
Posts: 6972
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Malas VS T2A

Post by Boris »

There's only one choice and that is Malas. It's ready to be used as we speak. All we need to do is spawn portal conjurers and it's open.

But ofcourse before that we need to triple our playerbase.

- Boris
Leather armor is best for sneaking, because it's literally made from hide.
User avatar
Tyrion
Posts: 2787
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 1:58 am

Re: Malas VS T2A

Post by Tyrion »

Glarundis wrote:I know how we got moonglow. I don't expect that we get other towns like that.
The old fashioned way? If I remember right, it takes 2 weeks of constantly keeping the guards out.
Now, 2 weeks is simply impossible, unless you had dozens of members to be constantly rotating while some sleep and the others fight. Now, this for 2 weeks. And, if by any chance, the opposing religion comes in full force (which it will, because 2 weeks is more than enough time) if they so much manage to keep you out for a bit, the guards all respawn, and the timer restarts, so long for your attempt.
Do you think that conquering a town this way is possible to achieve?
Glar, there is no point in arguing a true fact. With Imperial being reactivated, Moonglow was (by all estimations) given to us. Lets not beat the topic to death. HOWEVER, technically speaking ofcourse the work that the prior Imperial player base put into the Inquisition and the Holy War (years ago) to have it just deleted by prior staff to Boris, technically demanded that handicap be given to us as a result, technically.

I would be in favor of seeing Law be responsible for their base cities: Trinsic, Britain and maybe another. As their religion activity while higher than other religions (Tekstone and Nature) is not really capable of realistically holding all cities. If Tekstone / Nature were more active I would be in favor of giving them dominion over specific cities that matched their RP.
Post Reply