End of Ghuronius trial

[Glarundis]

omfg ppl...make ghuronious work like shalrius and keltrunius, simple as that
not OP, and it's a question of luck/tactics/whatever

sometimes it pays off to use ghuro, sometimes to use kelt or scarletite or daemonrock

there's no need to fully remove ghuronious, and keeping it exactly as it was is not an option imo

[Zaradon]

Change ghrunious effect.

[Mike]

Leave as it originally was

It made PvP more interesting, I think this has been stated convincingly enough. The idea of variety is naturally bullshit. It is not a virtue in and of itself. It has also not been a matter of chosing the right armor for any given situation without Ghuronius. People go with the best stuff they can afford to lose now, and with the old Ghuronius it was just the same. Keeping it would give an edge to non-religious PvPers due to it being worse then Keltrunius or a similar ore against them. That would actually provide some tactical consideration beyond asking oneself if one can afford to lose the dskull or if one should rather go with the scarly. That's working with a hierarchy of armors and no tactical scenario.

[Zaradon]

The idea of variety is naturally bullshit.

Ugh, why?

[Glarundis]

zara, i'm thinking it may have something to do with his ideals

[James Blackburn]

The idea of variety is naturally bullshit.

Ugh, why?

pretty much because peeps will keep using only scarletite or keltrunius and thats not variety at all

[Zaradon]

Ghrunious - 1 armor type
Kelt/Scarly - 2 armor types


Well...?

[Johnny Walac]

Ghurnious/Kelt/Scarly - 3 Armor types.

Get on my level son.

[Demian]

Ghurnious/Kelt/Scarly - 3 Armor types.

Get on my level son.

What level is that? In reality it's still:

Ghuronius

OR

Keltrunius/Scarletite/Daemonspine/Daemonrock/Daemonskull

The difference in the five armortypes above is not big enough to completely make any other armor listed not worth using. But if Ghuronius gets it's effect back, it's just simply way too much better than the others, which makes them all not worth using in PvP.

Though still, nothing changes the fact that Ghuronius ruins PvP, for some even more than others due to reasons I've already stated earlier. And that alone is reason enough to not have the effect back.

[Athan01]

This poll isn't a fair one as all the non religious people who probably don't even know how effective or ineffective this ore really is are probably voting.
A more accurate way to find out the opinion of in religions that use it is to select x amount of people from each religion and only take their non-anonymous votes into consideration.

Everyone has access to the ore and it isn't easy to get so keep it imo
It adds a bit of tactical play on the battlefield.
If I was in charge of a fight there was a "tank" in ghronius like Jerome for an example - send all the solituders/kill chant/magicusers on him and use all of the fighters to pick off the weaker people around him. What use will the ore have had there?
Such variety is just about to be yanked from the game from what I can see from these poll results - and imo it shouldn't be. Everyone has the same opportunity to use whatever they want so what is the problem.