Johnny Walac wrote:Ghurnious Nerf made it a 3 for me.
Haven't seen any announcements after the trial. What's the conclusion?
There was another poll on the religion forums after the trial which was even more decisive than before the trial. Clear majority from the voted options was to remove it from the game.
Johnny Walac wrote:Ghurnious Nerf made it a 3 for me.
Haven't seen any announcements after the trial. What's the conclusion?
There was another poll on the religion forums after the trial which was even more decisive than before the trial. Clear majority from the voted options was to remove it from the game.
Johnny Walac wrote:Ghurnious Nerf made it a 3 for me.
Haven't seen any announcements after the trial. What's the conclusion?
There was another poll on the religion forums after the trial which was even more decisive than before the trial. Clear majority from the voted options was to remove it from the game.
look at the % half voted for removing while half voted for for staying with or without nerf, so that clear majorty thing this bs imo, make an other pool with 2 options, remove or stay with/without nerf, not split the votes for those who want it to stay
James Blackburn wrote:
look at the % half voted for removing while half voted for for staying with or without nerf, so that clear majorty thing this bs imo, make an other pool with 2 options, remove or stay with/without nerf, not split the votes for those who want it to stay
I wouldn't read it 50/50. More like 3/4 wants to get rid of it or nerf it and 1/4 wants it to stay as it is. So you can make already some conclusions from that imo and if you want to make a new poll with two choises, they should be - Nerf or Remove?
James Blackburn wrote:look at the % half voted for removing while half voted for for staying with or without nerf, so that clear majorty thing this bs imo, make an other pool with 2 options, remove or stay with/without nerf, not split the votes for those who want it to stay
Errh, those are 3 very different and distinct options and I don't see why nerf and keep as it is should be combined into 1 vote when they are two totally different things?
From the poll topic:
1. Remove 48%
2. Keep it as it is 28%
3. Nerf (combined) 24%
I'd say that is pretty clear vote results no matter how you want to put it.
New items, materials,small and big fixes and typos fixed, new dungeons, more spawns, new races, new damage type, new gms RP oriented, charater recovery, very great stuff indeed.
A downside for it was the loss of Monad and Boris, but their legacy and current staff work has been great.
Pangaea is imo now better then ever was.
For the future would like to see more worlds, more hunting places, the mayor system, and a less boring siege system, and more and more players, newbs or oldies.
I also would like to know if old admins like repsak are aware that pangaea continues, and what do they think of pangaea at first look, compared to old times.
Ved Dwight wrote:but their legacy and current staff work has been great.
I think it's more like this actually =).
Current staff also got our love <3 and doing a fine job holding the ship, we can only expect greater things from them.. they just started in the 2nd day of year with the scribes thing.