Specified Pangaea Rules

[Quintoz]

That works, but imo add this.

"Due to religions being more powerful than the common guild, they are not allowed to war guilds that do not continuously keep attacking the religion in question or helping the enemy religion/guild in battle by other means. Screenshots of the attacks (Name is attacking you) and/or the guildmember blessing/spying for the enemy religion, must be sent to the gamemasters. The same applies to guilds whom are allied to a religion."

Also, from an RP perspective, religions shouldn't be so petty to attack most normal guilds, especially without much provocation.

That's your PoV, imo if some "weak" guild tries to mess with a religion they need to be put down hard. That will avoid further attempts to attack the religion.

[Iktomi]

True 'nough. The key will be to find the balance.

[Johnny Walac]

1 screenshot of someone running from a "Halt" shouldn't be enough either. Too easy to get. A few screenshots can prove though that the victim was actually running from a "Halt"

And for the war thing. If a guild/religion straight out attacks someone and tries to kill them, it's enough RP justification to war back if they so choose. Some send terms, some send warning, some want RP meetings but some want revenge.

[Demian]

1 screenshot of someone running from a "Halt" shouldn't be enough either. Too easy to get. A few screenshots can prove though that the victim was actually running from a "Halt"

And for the war thing. If a guild/religion straight out attacks someone and tries to kill them, it's enough RP justification to war back if they so choose. Some send terms, some send warning, some want RP meetings but some want revenge.

Fair enough, but the current freedom we are given in warring people is too lenient. There needs to be a clear reason as to why a religion is to war some random guild. And the proof should be sent to the staff for them to give their approval. The "continuously" could be removed from the suggestion I posted though.

[Johnny Walac]

1 screenshot of someone running from a "Halt" shouldn't be enough either. Too easy to get. A few screenshots can prove though that the victim was actually running from a "Halt"

And for the war thing. If a guild/religion straight out attacks someone and tries to kill them, it's enough RP justification to war back if they so choose. Some send terms, some send warning, some want RP meetings but some want revenge.

Fair enough, but the current freedom we are given in warring people is too lenient. There needs to be a clear reason as to why a religion is to war some random guild. And the proof should be sent to the staff for them to give their approval. The "continuously" could be removed from the suggestion I posted though.

I agree 100% with the post you did except that "continuously" aye. Screenshots of the clan "Attacking x" etc. Evidence can't get any more clearer than that.