New top title for negative virtue (grand finale)
Moderator: Game Masters
- Cirius Do'Brim
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:22 pm
Re: New top title for negative virtue (grand finale)
I think Wicked could beat Dread, but I'm no huge either fan due to slang reference (and other stuff). Vicious works more after Vile or something like that.
We could consider taking the Lord/Dame system back to use as well. So lets say you reach +128k of virtue and you become "Lord Zaradon". Lord status could have some benefits like guards acting differently or even having some control over guards (<guard name> follow me, <guard name> patrol and whatnot.) So that'd fit fine for positive virtue.
Now, what would the negative equivalent? Chaos lord/dame? Evil lord/dame?
We could consider taking the Lord/Dame system back to use as well. So lets say you reach +128k of virtue and you become "Lord Zaradon". Lord status could have some benefits like guards acting differently or even having some control over guards (<guard name> follow me, <guard name> patrol and whatnot.) So that'd fit fine for positive virtue.
Now, what would the negative equivalent? Chaos lord/dame? Evil lord/dame?
Re: New top title for negative virtue (grand finale)
Who wants to become Zaradon anyway?
I'd guess 90% of the shard would kill themself.
I'd guess 90% of the shard would kill themself.
- Darian Darkmind
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:58 pm
Re: New top title for negative virtue (grand finale)
Cyrus is right. If i kill a thousand dragons, does it make me a good person if at the same time i kill a thousand player characters.
ive never seen the titles very "rpish" which is why i'd prefer hunting unlocking them and we can then freely choose the one we think fits the best.
what comes to cirius' lord titles the problem is they were replaced with the heighten titles. According to repsak we cant have three titles (virtue, heighten and lord/sir/lady/dame). If we can, i think evil or good, you can be a lord, lady, sir or dame. No need for "evil" version of them
ive never seen the titles very "rpish" which is why i'd prefer hunting unlocking them and we can then freely choose the one we think fits the best.
what comes to cirius' lord titles the problem is they were replaced with the heighten titles. According to repsak we cant have three titles (virtue, heighten and lord/sir/lady/dame). If we can, i think evil or good, you can be a lord, lady, sir or dame. No need for "evil" version of them
- Cirius Do'Brim
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:22 pm
Re: New top title for negative virtue (grand finale)
You can if Lord/Dame is the virtue title. So after "The Glorious Xaeron Rosak" you become "Lord Xaeron Rosak". Also there would be an additional check if Dame/Lord, depending on sex. Otherwise good point with the extra heighten status crap. That needs some toggling or you'd be "The Ancient and Lord Xaeron Rosak" at some point. Less hassle, lets continue with the current system.Darian Darkmind wrote:what comes to cirius' lord titles the problem is they were replaced with the heighten titles. According to repsak we cant have three titles (virtue, heighten and lord/sir/lady/dame). If we can, i think evil or good, you can be a lord, lady, sir or dame. No need for "evil" version of them
From everything suggested in the previous 3 threads, the only thing that tops Dread is Monstrous. So what I would do is the following;
- Honorable...........200
Commendable......400
Admirable............800
Re(k)nowned.........1,600
Famed...............3,200
Noble.................6,400
Illustrious..........12,800
Great................25,600
Glorious.............51,200
Heroic.............102,400
Rude................-200
Unsavory..........-400
Dishonorable......-800
Dastardly..........-1,600
Malicious...........-3,200
Ignoble.............-6,400
Vile..................-12,800
Sinister.............-25,600
Dread...............-51,200
Monstrous..........-102,400
- Honorable...........200
Commendable......400
Admirable............800
Re(k)nowned.........1,600
Famed...............3,200
Noble.................6,400
Illustrious..........12,800
Great................25,600
Glorious.............51,200
Majestic..........102,400
Heroic.............204,800
Rude................-200
Unsavory..........-400
Dishonorable......-800
Dastardly..........-1,600
Malicious...........-3,200
Ignoble.............-6,400
Vile..................-12,800
Vicious.............-25,600
Sinister.............-51,200
Dread...............-102,400
Monstrous..........-204,800
Note: all bugged and flawed titles will be fixed. That applies to both negative and positive virtue. Currently we players with -554 million negative virtue and some with +165 million positive virtue.
Re: New top title for negative virtue (grand finale)
I like the look of that list, but I wonder how they are going to fix he bugged virtues?
Even if I did some resskilling at some point with my character for the good of someone else, I've certainly hunted enough to get the title itself within the last 8-9 years.
Even if I did some resskilling at some point with my character for the good of someone else, I've certainly hunted enough to get the title itself within the last 8-9 years.
- Cirius Do'Brim
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:22 pm
Re: New top title for negative virtue (grand finale)
How I see it, everyone with over -52k would be set back to -52k. Regardless of Wille capping dying and poison to a certain point, negative virtue still remains easier and faster to achieve than positive virtue. In which case all Dread would remain Dread (if we're talking of option #1). I guess I prefer that version because someone actually reaching +204k of positive virtue sounds pretty absurd.
Some sure, but even in your case it needs to be fixed or the system will never be balanced. You're at -12 million, we simply can't build a system that reaches that far. We'd need 8 new negative virtue titles.Ivan wrote:Even if I did some resskilling at some point with my character for the good of someone else, I've certainly hunted enough to get the title itself within the last 8-9 years.
Re: New top title for negative virtue (grand finale)
I'd go with the extra filling. Looks good.
- Darian Darkmind
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:58 pm
Re: New top title for negative virtue (grand finale)
We can add the titles without touching people's virtue. Yes, someone will have the title due to a bug or other reason, but it's just a title that grants nothing extra. It's not worth the effort dropping people's virtue - especially since some people might have more through an honest way.
Though I'd prefer "Infernal" over monstrous.
Though I'd prefer "Infernal" over monstrous.
- Cirius Do'Brim
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:22 pm
Re: New top title for negative virtue (grand finale)
Or have both, remove Vicious and no one will have their current virtue title changed. As such...Darian Darkmind wrote:Though I'd prefer "Infernal" over monstrous.
- Honorable...........200
Commendable......400
Admirable............800
Re(k)nowned.........1,600
Famed...............3,200
Noble.................6,400
Illustrious..........12,800
Great................25,600
Glorious.............51,200
Majestic..........102,400
Heroic.............204,800
Rude................-200
Unsavory..........-400
Dishonorable......-800
Dastardly..........-1,600
Malicious...........-3,200
Ignoble.............-6,400
Vile..................-12,800
Sinister.............-25,600
Dread.............-51,200
Monstrous........-102,400
Infernal..........-204,800
Lets go Zabren, clap-clap-clapclapclap!
Re: New top title for negative virtue (grand finale)
Wait, now when we're at it - what's the candy for all this "Oh wow" achievement?