Palma wrote:
"1. It's not mandatory to use. Ares." It might not be mandatory but I'm sure it has a purpouse or else you wouldn't add it. I as a player would like to Understand from you the staff, what that purpouse is so I can use it best to assist both you and me, with whatever intention you had when adding such a comand.
"2. If victim runs you can attack. Ares." is contraditory to the in game .halt messages. For example "Halt! You have 15 seconds to comply", and then you can just attack after two seconds if he doesn't halt? That makes no sense.
It's been explained again and again.
1. You're encouraged to use it so there's 0 doubt.
2. Yes it makes sense. If the victim stops for example, you should give him some time to comply with your demands.
And again, it's under development and will be expanded as we go. Do you understand that sentence?
Palma wrote:
"1. It's not mandatory to use. Ares." It might not be mandatory but I'm sure it has a purpouse or else you wouldn't add it. I as a player would like to Understand from you the staff, what that purpouse is so I can use it best to assist both you and me, with whatever intention you had when adding such a comand.
"2. If victim runs you can attack. Ares." is contraditory to the in game .halt messages. For example "Halt! You have 15 seconds to comply", and then you can just attack after two seconds if he doesn't halt? That makes no sense.
It's been explained again and again.
1. You're encouraged to use it so there's 0 doubt.
2. Yes it makes sense. If the victim stops for example, you should give him some time to comply with your demands.
And again, it's under development and will be expanded as we go. Do you understand that sentence?
Explained again and again where? I don't find the posts. Oh wait, you mean you keep explaining it to people on ICQ again and again and others are supposed to guess? And when we ask here you call us retards? It's getting old you insulting and freaking out because people make you repeat yourself on ICQ. And yes I understand that sentence, thank you for your concern. Yet it doesn't still explain the doubt.
Can you just confirm if Prince's answers are correct? Would be helpfull to see the examples. Thanks in advance
On a side note, if you could go google the difference between "a person asking you something because he has a doubt", to "he's being a dick", we'd all appreciate thank you. If you wonder why this, go check the previous posts and check how you're answering people with their doubts.
Palma wrote:
"1. It's not mandatory to use. Ares." It might not be mandatory but I'm sure it has a purpouse or else you wouldn't add it. I as a player would like to Understand from you the staff, what that purpouse is so I can use it best to assist both you and me, with whatever intention you had when adding such a comand.
"2. If victim runs you can attack. Ares." is contraditory to the in game .halt messages. For example "Halt! You have 15 seconds to comply", and then you can just attack after two seconds if he doesn't halt? That makes no sense.
It's been explained again and again.
1. You're encouraged to use it so there's 0 doubt.
2. Yes it makes sense. If the victim stops for example, you should give him some time to comply with your demands.
And again, it's under development and will be expanded as we go. Do you understand that sentence?
Explained again and again where? I don't find the posts. Oh wait, you mean you keep explaining it to people on ICQ again and again and others are supposed to guess? And when we ask here you call us retards? It's getting old you insulting and freaking out because people make you repeat yourself on ICQ. And yes I understand that sentence, thank you for your concern. Yet it doesn't still explain the doubt.
Can you just confirm if Prince's answers are correct? Would be helpfull to see the examples. Thanks in advance
On a side note, if you could go google the difference between "a person asking you something because he has a doubt", to "he's being a dick", we'd all appreciate thank you. If you wonder why this, go check the previous posts and check how you're answering people with their doubts.
Cruxis Bane wrote:I feel like everything has been said that needs to on it, if you are still confused about the .halt then just dont use it since its not required?
If you are confused, simply don't play the game...
Do you really mean to jail a player never jailed before for not understanding something? For asking despite being called a retard publically and ironically call him stupid for not understanding? With the reason "being annoying"??
I'm sorry if I have doubts.
Something is seriously wrong here.
Last edited by Palma on Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
What tone? Everytime I make a question everyone assumes my tone. I have a doubt, that's it.
Does anyone like to be called a retard for that? Like Wallac makes a question and Ares's answer is "Do you have amnesia?".... wtf man, Are we all a group or what? Can we have doubts? Can we ask stuff without being jailed??
Secondly, we have a new .halt dot command that's supposed to be used for those "halt or dai" situations to make sure there's 0 doubt about intentions or when it's OK to attack. Aggressors should take a screenshot of both when the command is used and when the timer is up.
Explains everything there is to be explained, one wouldn't create a topic to answer people's doubts. And if people do ask doubts, one doesn't call them retards. Where's Ares's jail for that? How come I make a question and instantly people assume my tone as a bad one, and then Ares calling people retards is a good one?
Everything you have asked has been answered in this thread already though so there was no reason to continuously go on about questions answered in the beginning pages.
