I've updated the PvP rules with the information re: .halt. Sorry for the confusion.
I've also edited the text that occurs when you use .halt (however this won't take effect until a reboot).
Discussions about the new PvP rules
Moderator: Game Masters
Re: Discussions about the new PvP rules
This just makes it look like AGs are the bad guys on the story.
Also you should put the facts straight for future reference.
Video of the rp of the Fight.
DMS member #2 said something on DMS uomap, that got leaked to teks and they assumed it was him who told us. Everything about the war was OoC and you should place that on the announcement.
Also you should put the facts straight for future reference.
Video of the rp of the Fight.
DMS member #2 was never there to begin with.Iktomi wrote:Following the death of the dragon, DMS member #2 ran off.
* DMS member #2 ejected from DMS
DMS member #2 said something on DMS uomap, that got leaked to teks and they assumed it was him who told us. Everything about the war was OoC and you should place that on the announcement.
Remove convocation/druid gates and people can start RP in actually robberies/ pvp fights, that way people can RP in peace without fearing the target will leave in a second. Also you can see on video that we made our intentions clear about why we killed darian. I'm guessing same reasons teks gives to when they kill natures on dungeons.Iktomi wrote:Armageddon Glory members shortly arrived and killed and looted the Tekstone member (with no opportunity for the remaining DMS member or Tekstone member to offer explanations/discussion).
- Johnny Walac
- Posts: 4503
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:05 pm
- Location: Sweden
Re: Discussions about the new PvP rules
But, you are the bad guys in this story.Biao wrote:This just makes it look like AGs are the bad guys on the story.
And the War ain't OOC. Totally legit. Beating a dead horse here, Biao.
1. Tekstone helping DMS
2. AG ganking that Tekstone member.
3. Tekstone think DMS tipped them off
4. War
5. Profit.
Sucks that you fucked it up for DMS but thats AG for ya.
Re: Discussions about the new PvP rules
Fact is Tek gave DMS 100% OOC terms to end the war. You asked them to kick a member from the guild who had nothing to do with that kill. If you had asked Gilius to be kicked, it would have made sense since he was there. But you didn't. You chose someone else because of personal issues. Once again we see how you value loot and griefing over RP. And how staff just encourages that kind of behaviour to some..
- Johnny Walac
- Posts: 4503
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:05 pm
- Location: Sweden
Re: Discussions about the new PvP rules
Could have asked their leader to be kicked due to not controlling his members. Could have asked alot of things. Tekstone choose the terms, not you and not anyone else. For it was Tekstone who declared war, not you and not anyone else. If it were up to me the terms would be to bring Birgita into my bedchamber for a night, though it was selfish and the other members denied me the satisfaction.Demian wrote:Fact is Tek gave DMS 100% OOC terms to end the war. You asked them to kick a member from the guild who had nothing to do with that kill. If you had asked Gilius to be kicked, it would have made sense since he was there. But you didn't. You chose someone else because of personal issues. Once again we see how you value loot and griefing over RP. And how staff just encourages that kind of behaviour to some..
Re: Discussions about the new PvP rules
The main part of that announcement is false and that is my point. Gms seems to want to justify the war that way, so they look nice...Johnny Walac wrote:And the War ain't OOC. Totally legit. Beating a dead horse here, Biao.Biao wrote:This just makes it look like AGs are the bad guys on the story.
Just like all the other war declarations this should be an illegal one, at least with this reasons.
-
- Posts: 1097
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:59 am
- Contact:
Re: Discussions about the new PvP rules
You always blame everyone else for wanting loot and being griefers demian however you and palma have constantly said how your routinely out tracking dungeons and the mainland looking for people to kill.
Re: Discussions about the new PvP rules
PvP = griefing? Tek warring hunting guilds (who obviously did not choose to be a part of the wars in the first place) with the very minimal RP requirements that anyone could conjure up (like AG showed), is a completely different thing. If you think PvP between people who actively take part in it is griefing, then this is definately not the shard for you.Cruxis Bane wrote:You always blame everyone else for wanting loot and being griefers demian however you and palma have constantly said how your routinely out tracking dungeons and the mainland looking for people to kill.
Re: Discussions about the new PvP rules
You talk about things you don't know. Like most of people that come here and shoot random stuff.Cruxis Bane wrote:You always blame everyone else for wanting loot and being griefers demian however you and palma have constantly said how your routinely out tracking dungeons and the mainland looking for people to kill.
Imps were the ones that started this. They caught Zarek hunting and killed him.
After that a pvm pact was suggested by Imps, both Law/Ag agreed with it! Some imps and jonhy didnt. So everything was allowed and we started to play their game.
Before this AG's NEVER hunted imps inside dungeons.
Same thing happened with teks.
They are inactive so they just don't care. They log they robbe some random nature and they log out. Nothing people can do.
And you call us the griefers... right !