Class changes
Moderator: Game Masters
Class changes
Did we miss something? Questions? Post them here.
Re: Class changes
Hm it says 85 tactics on priests, I do believe it should be 100. Kappa
Stop the cuckening on Pang #MakePangGreat
Re: Class changes
thank you so much for this update..it's already making me want to play again
Re: Class changes
could you add something concerning specific things attached to classes, like regen and stuff like that?i'm hoping that since warriors get 100 focus and 100 archery, they won't have that regen they had here in pangpol?
also, good job on focusing thief on stealing only while leaving picking for thunters
also, considering the whole religious/piety system is going to be different, do you think having priests/knights exactly the way they are won't mean they will suck?considering the fact that you said now there won't be much difference between religious characters and non religious characters..where are these classes' edge now?
also, good job on focusing thief on stealing only while leaving picking for thunters
also, considering the whole religious/piety system is going to be different, do you think having priests/knights exactly the way they are won't mean they will suck?considering the fact that you said now there won't be much difference between religious characters and non religious characters..where are these classes' edge now?
Re: Class changes
I think this document just highlights why a full wipe would make the game so much better.
Stop the cuckening on Pang #MakePangGreat
-
- Counselor
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 7:07 pm
- Contact:
Re: Class changes
Also note the interesting 65 spirit speak on priests
Re: Class changes
Bumb up focus to 100 for mage, if I remember correctly it affects mana regeneration aswell, unless you are going to implement the same casting speed system as current pang has... or etc.
Oh and is there any reasons why you had to remove archer class altogether? It doesnt make sense. Remove ranger instead!
EDIT: Just to point out that archer class was much more popular than ranger always, I just dont see a reason for a popular and well balanced class to be removed.
Oh and is there any reasons why you had to remove archer class altogether? It doesnt make sense. Remove ranger instead!
EDIT: Just to point out that archer class was much more popular than ranger always, I just dont see a reason for a popular and well balanced class to be removed.
Re: Class changes
if you want a reason, i always thought it was weird for a class to have 100 tactics 85 poisoning 85 healing. not to mention the usefulness of archery in pvm.i can't say how good it was vs the money spent on arrows and stuff, but i'm guessing it was one of the best pvm'er, if not the most sought after (with exception of druids always being popular for obvious reasons, although we're talking about dps here)
Re: Class changes
Whats weird with those skills if the class was well balanced, no matter what the skills are.
I dont get your point glar.
EDIT: Archer class was one of the only classes along with barbarian, which were hardly changed because they were the most balanced out of the classes. Unlike priest which had to be fiddled all the time or knight... I just dont see a point removing something that works instead of removing something that is causing troubles to balance or something that aint popular. If you have to remove anything at all.
I dont get your point glar.
EDIT: Archer class was one of the only classes along with barbarian, which were hardly changed because they were the most balanced out of the classes. Unlike priest which had to be fiddled all the time or knight... I just dont see a point removing something that works instead of removing something that is causing troubles to balance or something that aint popular. If you have to remove anything at all.
Re: Class changes
Thanks for all the hard work guys!
And 40 focus. What is focus for?KrondorZuula wrote:Also note the interesting 65 spirit speak on priests