I want Malas. It is unique, and I like it.
I dont' really see how we will have a lot more players to ever require Malas again, so shuting it down will be as good as removing it. Honestly, though, when you have like 2 players online, it doesn't really matter if they are at two places on Britainia or one being on Malas while the other is on Britain.
debate
Moderator: Game Masters
-
Tiffany Crewe
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:09 am
- Contact:
-
aldath c'om
- Posts: 1373
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:06 am
- Location: tampere
- Contact:
Re: debate
i suggest that you close malas at least but keep dungeons and make them so we can still hunt in them from fel.
also you could spawn some monsters in areas in fel wheres actually nothing. theres huge areas with just one raven in there.
also you could spawn some monsters in areas in fel wheres actually nothing. theres huge areas with just one raven in there.
291-697-526
-
Kent Strider
Re: debate
I can agree to shutting down Malas and Imperial, will suck to lose my stuff but if it is for the good of the shard then go for it.
-
Andrew De'lere
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:34 pm
Re: debate
Just popping in to day hi!
If this would have been done 2/3 years ago there might still be a playerbase :p
If this would have been done 2/3 years ago there might still be a playerbase :p
Re: debate
Teleporters to the dungeons can be done or a few (Fel) dungeons could be spawned with traditional Malas monsters.aldath c'om wrote:i suggest that you close malas at least but keep dungeons and make them so we can still hunt in them from fel.
also you could spawn some monsters in areas in fel wheres actually nothing. theres huge areas with just one raven in there.
And how will you loose your stuff?Kent Strider wrote:I can agree to shutting down Malas and Imperial, will suck to lose my stuff but if it is for the good of the shard then go for it.
This should/could of been done earlier, yes. The playerbase is another thing.Andrew De'lere wrote:If this would have been done 2/3 years ago there might still be a playerbase :p
- Boris
Leather armor is best for sneaking, because it's literally made from hide.
-
aldath c'om
- Posts: 1373
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:06 am
- Location: tampere
- Contact:
-
Kent Strider
Re: debate
How will I lose my stuff? 60 piety or 50 piety will be completely unfeasible for me, making my priest worth nilch 
Re: debate
Your priest is already worth nilch, as it isn't used.Kent Strider wrote:How will I lose my stuff? 60 piety or 50 piety will be completely unfeasible for me, making my priest worth nilch
- Boris
Leather armor is best for sneaking, because it's literally made from hide.
Re: debate
No, it would mean i have to find logs and veins all over again since i only play merchants. It's way too much work especially for my smith and there goes 1000+ assay kits wasted. It might not be a big impact on the fighter class but big impact on merchants. so NO, should've closed Malas right after the item wipes not at this time.
I do log on automap most of the time so I don't see how I am playing on my own or what not.
I do log on automap most of the time so I don't see how I am playing on my own or what not.
In the big woods when you leave familiar ground alone, there will be feelings of curiosity and excitement, a little nagging of the dread. It is the ancient fear of the Unknown, and it is your first bond with the wilderness. -:-
-
Kent Strider
Re: debate
And your a dick, but I didn't say that aloud. Not much fun being in a religion no one really wants in ya know. Also I was agreeing with you, the playerbase definitely needs to be centered, sorry smiths, and only smiths.Boris wrote:Your priest is already worth nilch, as it isn't used.Kent Strider wrote:How will I lose my stuff? 60 piety or 50 piety will be completely unfeasible for me, making my priest worth nilch
- Boris