New rule

For general discussion concerning Pangaea

Moderator: Game Masters

User avatar
Quintoz
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: New rule

Post by Quintoz »

Glarundis wrote:like I said, we'll create a way so that rich ppl loot themselves, and ppl who are trying to get rich, won't make it
Yeah man, new world order.
Image

Stop the cuckening on Pang #MakePangGreat
Kent Strider

Re: New rule

Post by Kent Strider »

I think the merchants need this more than clothes need to be moved is all im sayin
User avatar
Johnny Walac
Posts: 4503
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: New rule

Post by Johnny Walac »

Everyone can have opinions but in the end it's all up to the boss.

All Hail Imperator Alteran <3

Cloths for the people!

Thanks.
Image
Order of Nature - Telborea- The Britannian Trade Union - ICQ: 434212709
PvP Video 1
PvP Video 2
Ranokan
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:16 am

Re: New rule

Post by Ranokan »

My opinion for this rule goes towards that if it is to only allow certain items to be looted, then it should be crafted items the priority so that the economy starts kicking again.

I understand that this rule will be easier for robber instead of the hunter. My thought relies on the fact that a robber char is PvP oriented. An example for this is that a PvP archer configuration is quite different than a PvM archer configuration and that goes along the line of many other classes.

I'm not here to whine because I am also in favor of the theory that you should not wear things that you are not mentally ready to lose. So if this time magic cloths are put on the looting pool, then only use the ones you are okay to lose or that you are confident you won't lose.

But this doesn't change the fact that the robber chars will mostly have the upper hand on a ambush. A way to avoid this (and sorry to bring this here again) is to enforce the rule that Law accounts should not have robber chars. I refer to this because generally who have Law char will mostly like to PVP. And generally those who have robber chars will also like to PvP, so if those 2 types are put on different sides, then there might be some sort of balance, since a Law account (unless there is religion fighting) will most likely be actively trying to hunt for robbers. At the moment (and sorry again to bring this) those who have Law/red chars will most likely hunt with their Law char (cause it's even better tome for PvM than Nature (lol?)) and will use their red chars to make robberies (being protected from most Law who should be hunting them).

This is clear imo and for me while the law/red rule is not implemented there should not even be looting. After this rule is again implemented, then sure start the looting in ways you want, being my opinion that hand crafted items should be the ones to be put at first place.
Image
User avatar
Mike
Posts: 2465
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: New rule

Post by Mike »

Alexander wrote:My opinion for this rule goes towards that if it is to only allow certain items to be looted, then it should be crafted items the priority so that the economy starts kicking again.

I understand that this rule will be easier for robber instead of the hunter. My thought relies on the fact that a robber char is PvP oriented. An example for this is that a PvP archer configuration is quite different than a PvM archer configuration and that goes along the line of many other classes.

I'm not here to whine because I am also in favor of the theory that you should not wear things that you are not mentally ready to lose. So if this time magic cloths are put on the looting pool, then only use the ones you are okay to lose or that you are confident you won't lose.

But this doesn't change the fact that the robber chars will mostly have the upper hand on a ambush. A way to avoid this (and sorry to bring this here again) is to enforce the rule that Law accounts should not have robber chars. I refer to this because generally who have Law char will mostly like to PVP. And generally those who have robber chars will also like to PvP, so if those 2 types are put on different sides, then there might be some sort of balance, since a Law account (unless there is religion fighting) will most likely be actively trying to hunt for robbers. At the moment (and sorry again to bring this) those who have Law/red chars will most likely hunt with their Law char (cause it's even better tome for PvM than Nature (lol?)) and will use their red chars to make robberies (being protected from most Law who should be hunting them).

This is clear imo and for me while the law/red rule is not implemented there should not even be looting. After this rule is again implemented, then sure start the looting in ways you want, being my opinion that hand crafted items should be the ones to be put at first place.
Why are you under the impression that Law would save your Imperial ass?
"last i knew it was illegal to hate someone" Richard Mota
User avatar
Quintoz
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: New rule

Post by Quintoz »

Alexander wrote:My opinion for this rule goes towards that if it is to only allow certain items to be looted, then it should be crafted items the priority so that the economy starts kicking again.

I understand that this rule will be easier for robber instead of the hunter. My thought relies on the fact that a robber char is PvP oriented. An example for this is that a PvP archer configuration is quite different than a PvM archer configuration and that goes along the line of many other classes.

I'm not here to whine because I am also in favor of the theory that you should not wear things that you are not mentally ready to lose. So if this time magic cloths are put on the looting pool, then only use the ones you are okay to lose or that you are confident you won't lose.

But this doesn't change the fact that the robber chars will mostly have the upper hand on a ambush. A way to avoid this (and sorry to bring this here again) is to enforce the rule that Law accounts should not have robber chars. I refer to this because generally who have Law char will mostly like to PVP. And generally those who have robber chars will also like to PvP, so if those 2 types are put on different sides, then there might be some sort of balance, since a Law account (unless there is religion fighting) will most likely be actively trying to hunt for robbers. At the moment (and sorry again to bring this) those who have Law/red chars will most likely hunt with their Law char (cause it's even better tome for PvM than Nature (lol?)) and will use their red chars to make robberies (being protected from most Law who should be hunting them).

This is clear imo and for me while the law/red rule is not implemented there should not even be looting. After this rule is again implemented, then sure start the looting in ways you want, being my opinion that hand crafted items should be the ones to be put at first place.
If they preformed exploratory surgery on your brain, would they find that the intake of information is limited to only 10%?
Image

Stop the cuckening on Pang #MakePangGreat
Ranokan
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:16 am

Re: New rule

Post by Ranokan »

Are you stupid?

Was not even thinking on "my Imperial char", but it's a fact that this server requires Law to keep the "balance" between good and evil (hell I am even giving them propose), or why did they get to have op tome at first place?

ffs I just brought here my opinion not asking you to agree with it. But at least respect it, grow up already.
Image
User avatar
Mike
Posts: 2465
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: New rule

Post by Mike »

Alexander wrote:Are you stupid?

Was not even thinking on "my Imperial char", but it's a fact that this server requires Law to keep the "balance" between good and evil (hell I am even giving them propose), or why did they get to have op tome at first place?

ffs I just brought here my opinion not asking you to agree with it. But at least respect it, grow up already.
If you want respect you'll have you earn it dude.
"last i knew it was illegal to hate someone" Richard Mota
User avatar
Quintoz
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: New rule

Post by Quintoz »

Well your bringing up things that have been discussed in lenght and lead nowhere, now your doing the samething to this topic, so I can allways repeat your question and get all personal, but you know what? I aint no goddamn son of a bitch.
Image

Stop the cuckening on Pang #MakePangGreat
Ranokan
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:16 am

Re: New rule

Post by Ranokan »

lol whatever you wish. I hope it satisfies you, not going argue with lame remarks.
Image
Post Reply