New rule
Moderator: Game Masters
Re: New rule
Quintoz if I see them related then sure I will bring it and give my point, you are no one to tell me what I should or should not say. No need to get that personal.
Re: New rule
shit!i'm so fucking tired of you two guys. all you can do is write 1 or 2 lines flaming everyone else that goes just a little bit against your line of thought or in any way (even if it's just) damages your way of playing. you're looking like the old finnish gang sometimes. stop it already.
anytime someone brings the law/red issue you immediately start flaming because it's oh so precious for you to have it that way, like alexander said.
law pvm powerhunt for one side, red robbing
not to mention you can't confront your own char ig
law/red only brings trouble, and now even more with cloth looting
even if imps or natures have .mayday, law are the ones with tomes to kick robber's asses
anytime someone brings the law/red issue you immediately start flaming because it's oh so precious for you to have it that way, like alexander said.
law pvm powerhunt for one side, red robbing
not to mention you can't confront your own char ig
law/red only brings trouble, and now even more with cloth looting
even if imps or natures have .mayday, law are the ones with tomes to kick robber's asses
Re: New rule
I heard you don't even log, I hope it's not the new rules keeping you out man.Alexander wrote:lol whatever you wish. I hope it satisfies you, not going argue with lame remarks.
"last i knew it was illegal to hate someone" Richard Mota
Re: New rule
Again.. thread derail milk gone bad bigtime, please lock it
Re: New rule
Makes me sad to read this bro. I never had problems against non-religious chars as Tek or Imp but maybe something changed?Glarundis wrote: law/red only brings trouble, and now even more with cloth looting
even if imps or natures have .mayday, law are the ones with tomes to kick robber's asses
"last i knew it was illegal to hate someone" Richard Mota
Re: New rule
First of all I don't have a red char, but that's the only thing that keeps my law char entertained, due to Imp being hairless.Glarundis wrote:shit!i'm so fucking tired of you two guys. all you can do is write 1 or 2 lines flaming everyone else that goes just a little bit against your line of thought or in any way (even if it's just) damages your way of playing. you're looking like the old finnish gang sometimes. stop it already.
anytime someone brings the law/red issue you immediately start flaming because it's oh so precious for you to have it that way, like alexander said.
law pvm powerhunt for one side, red robbing
not to mention you can't confront your own char ig
law/red only brings trouble, and now even more with cloth looting
even if imps or natures have .mayday, law are the ones with tomes to kick robber's asses
You keep blaming our tome yet when me and mike was Imp we didn't shit our pants when we saw Law, we beat their ass they were running scared with skidmarks up in them white underwear, know you?
Stop the cuckening on Pang #MakePangGreat
Re: New rule
This shall be my last reply to this useless never-ending personal flaming.
The way you play the game is yours to chose, I am not here crying for rites. If I/we are not PvPing it is our choice and not yours. It doesn't have nothing to do with being capable or not, it is more on how we want to play this game. If Imperial members seek more PvP it won't be here that it will be discussed, and again, it is not your call.
The way you play the game is yours to chose, I am not here crying for rites. If I/we are not PvPing it is our choice and not yours. It doesn't have nothing to do with being capable or not, it is more on how we want to play this game. If Imperial members seek more PvP it won't be here that it will be discussed, and again, it is not your call.
Re: New rule
I'm not saying it's impossible to beat law.
But everyone can see your tome _is_ better.
and to mike
No, I don't know if something has changed, I haven't even pvp'ed since I came back, and I probably won't until I get a connection that doesn't crash just because it decides to. You are right, no religion should have problems beating robbers. But it seems that they are having trouble.
But there's also one thing
Nature are inactive
Tekstone, can't say what they are good
Imperial, most of us just restarted, so you can't except to say "hey we beat imp, we are better than imp" because we don't even have reasonable chars to pvp with yet.
The religion that is left, that could actually do something about is Law. the religion with red chars
But everyone can see your tome _is_ better.
and to mike
No, I don't know if something has changed, I haven't even pvp'ed since I came back, and I probably won't until I get a connection that doesn't crash just because it decides to. You are right, no religion should have problems beating robbers. But it seems that they are having trouble.
But there's also one thing
Nature are inactive
Tekstone, can't say what they are good
Imperial, most of us just restarted, so you can't except to say "hey we beat imp, we are better than imp" because we don't even have reasonable chars to pvp with yet.
The religion that is left, that could actually do something about is Law. the religion with red chars
- Johnny Walac
- Posts: 4503
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:05 pm
- Location: Sweden
Re: New rule
Alexander wrote:This shall be my last reply to this useless never-ending personal flaming.
The way you play the game is yours to chose, I am not here crying for rites. If I/we are not PvPing it is our choice and not yours. It doesn't have nothing to do with being capable or not, it is more on how we want to play this game. If Imperial members seek more PvP it won't be here that it will be discussed, and again, it is not your call.
You can't roleplay paper and then whine when people wipe their ass with you.
Imperial has been in war with Law for a very long time and it's very un-rpish that they suddenly turn into a friendly..thingie.
I have nothing against anyone in Imperial. But it just doesn't seem right.
Re: New rule
Ouch, I had hoped you wouldn't go there... now I have to go and tell you it's none of your business what Law should do. Hope that didn't ruin the topic for you.Alexander wrote:This shall be my last reply to this useless never-ending personal flaming.
The way you play the game is yours to chose, I am not here crying for rites. If I/we are not PvPing it is our choice and not yours. It doesn't have nothing to do with being capable or not, it is more on how we want to play this game. If Imperial members seek more PvP it won't be here that it will be discussed, and again, it is not your call.
"last i knew it was illegal to hate someone" Richard Mota