New rule

For general discussion concerning Pangaea

Moderator: Game Masters

Ranokan
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:16 am

Re: New rule

Post by Ranokan »

Quintoz if I see them related then sure I will bring it and give my point, you are no one to tell me what I should or should not say. No need to get that personal.
Image
User avatar
Glarundis
Posts: 5741
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:26 pm
Contact:

Re: New rule

Post by Glarundis »

shit!i'm so fucking tired of you two guys. all you can do is write 1 or 2 lines flaming everyone else that goes just a little bit against your line of thought or in any way (even if it's just) damages your way of playing. you're looking like the old finnish gang sometimes. stop it already.

anytime someone brings the law/red issue you immediately start flaming because it's oh so precious for you to have it that way, like alexander said.
law pvm powerhunt for one side, red robbing
not to mention you can't confront your own char ig

law/red only brings trouble, and now even more with cloth looting
even if imps or natures have .mayday, law are the ones with tomes to kick robber's asses
User avatar
Mike
Posts: 2465
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: New rule

Post by Mike »

Alexander wrote:lol whatever you wish. I hope it satisfies you, not going argue with lame remarks.
I heard you don't even log, I hope it's not the new rules keeping you out man.
"last i knew it was illegal to hate someone" Richard Mota
Melkor
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:11 am

Re: New rule

Post by Melkor »

Again.. thread derail milk gone bad bigtime, please lock it :)
Image
User avatar
Mike
Posts: 2465
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: New rule

Post by Mike »

Glarundis wrote: law/red only brings trouble, and now even more with cloth looting
even if imps or natures have .mayday, law are the ones with tomes to kick robber's asses
Makes me sad to read this bro. I never had problems against non-religious chars as Tek or Imp but maybe something changed? ;)
"last i knew it was illegal to hate someone" Richard Mota
User avatar
Quintoz
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: New rule

Post by Quintoz »

Glarundis wrote:shit!i'm so fucking tired of you two guys. all you can do is write 1 or 2 lines flaming everyone else that goes just a little bit against your line of thought or in any way (even if it's just) damages your way of playing. you're looking like the old finnish gang sometimes. stop it already.

anytime someone brings the law/red issue you immediately start flaming because it's oh so precious for you to have it that way, like alexander said.
law pvm powerhunt for one side, red robbing
not to mention you can't confront your own char ig

law/red only brings trouble, and now even more with cloth looting
even if imps or natures have .mayday, law are the ones with tomes to kick robber's asses
First of all I don't have a red char, but that's the only thing that keeps my law char entertained, due to Imp being hairless.
You keep blaming our tome yet when me and mike was Imp we didn't shit our pants when we saw Law, we beat their ass they were running scared with skidmarks up in them white underwear, know you?
Image

Stop the cuckening on Pang #MakePangGreat
Ranokan
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:16 am

Re: New rule

Post by Ranokan »

This shall be my last reply to this useless never-ending personal flaming.

The way you play the game is yours to chose, I am not here crying for rites. If I/we are not PvPing it is our choice and not yours. It doesn't have nothing to do with being capable or not, it is more on how we want to play this game. If Imperial members seek more PvP it won't be here that it will be discussed, and again, it is not your call.
Image
User avatar
Glarundis
Posts: 5741
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:26 pm
Contact:

Re: New rule

Post by Glarundis »

I'm not saying it's impossible to beat law.
But everyone can see your tome _is_ better.

and to mike
No, I don't know if something has changed, I haven't even pvp'ed since I came back, and I probably won't until I get a connection that doesn't crash just because it decides to. You are right, no religion should have problems beating robbers. But it seems that they are having trouble.
But there's also one thing
Nature are inactive
Tekstone, can't say what they are good
Imperial, most of us just restarted, so you can't except to say "hey we beat imp, we are better than imp" because we don't even have reasonable chars to pvp with yet.
The religion that is left, that could actually do something about is Law. the religion with red chars :P
User avatar
Johnny Walac
Posts: 4503
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: New rule

Post by Johnny Walac »

Alexander wrote:This shall be my last reply to this useless never-ending personal flaming.

The way you play the game is yours to chose, I am not here crying for rites. If I/we are not PvPing it is our choice and not yours. It doesn't have nothing to do with being capable or not, it is more on how we want to play this game. If Imperial members seek more PvP it won't be here that it will be discussed, and again, it is not your call.

You can't roleplay paper and then whine when people wipe their ass with you.

Imperial has been in war with Law for a very long time and it's very un-rpish that they suddenly turn into a friendly..thingie.

I have nothing against anyone in Imperial. But it just doesn't seem right.
Image
Order of Nature - Telborea- The Britannian Trade Union - ICQ: 434212709
PvP Video 1
PvP Video 2
User avatar
Mike
Posts: 2465
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: New rule

Post by Mike »

Alexander wrote:This shall be my last reply to this useless never-ending personal flaming.

The way you play the game is yours to chose, I am not here crying for rites. If I/we are not PvPing it is our choice and not yours. It doesn't have nothing to do with being capable or not, it is more on how we want to play this game. If Imperial members seek more PvP it won't be here that it will be discussed, and again, it is not your call.
Ouch, I had hoped you wouldn't go there... now I have to go and tell you it's none of your business what Law should do. Hope that didn't ruin the topic for you.
"last i knew it was illegal to hate someone" Richard Mota
Post Reply