Books you read
Moderator: Game Masters
Re: Books you read
Mike, your pretty racist aren't you? I mean like not even kidding, your straight up racist.
Re: Books you read
Can't comment on it bro, and this thread was about books anyway. Check Codreanu out.Kent Strider wrote:Mike, your pretty racist aren't you? I mean like not even kidding, your straight up racist.
"last i knew it was illegal to hate someone" Richard Mota
Re: Books you read
I already warned Mike. I think we can move on.
And to anyone else, you can talk about your bullshit ideology over ICQ. A public forum for a game that kids play is not the place to spread your propaganda.
Anyone else posting links/comments about any racist/prejudice/neo-nazi crap will get an immideate 14 day jail. Retarded crap like that has no place here.
And to anyone else, you can talk about your bullshit ideology over ICQ. A public forum for a game that kids play is not the place to spread your propaganda.
Anyone else posting links/comments about any racist/prejudice/neo-nazi crap will get an immideate 14 day jail. Retarded crap like that has no place here.
Re: Books you read
Based on some of the things I've read I would assume (possibly incorrectly, but I doubt it) that there is a tinge of blind racism going on and a sense of ignorant personal elitism. Not the best reference to use for the term, I know, but it is the most culturally accurate definition for our time.Kent Strider wrote:Mike, your pretty racist aren't you? I mean like not even kidding, your straight up racist.
I tend to read magazines atm: Time, The Atlantic, The Economist, Foreign Affairs and the like. Some books I plan on reading (now that I have my Kindle Fire): The Worst-Kept Secret: Israel's Bargain with the Bomb (notice the politically correct referencing of a group of people: Israelis), Game of Thrones and Critique of Pure Reason. I tend to jump back and forth between books as my interests change.
- Maximilian Lhoth
- Posts: 2871
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:05 am
- Location: 378093000
- Contact:
Re: Books you read
A bit off topic. Talked with Mike about swedish "far right" and it appears to be really softcore compared to what the word "neo nazi" makes you think of. Differs heavily from, say, Russian neo nazi culture. This may correlate with the fact(?) that swedes have "softer" male culture than finns or russians. Finnish "manly" male culture is one hell of a mental castration. To appear manly, you have to be a "d1ckrider" who can't talk about his feelings etc, gotta play tough all the time. My personal opinion of "swedish school" as Mike has described it to me, is that it may make some sense, it is not "evil" by nature. Its nature is more like defensive than offensive.
I personally am also an odd case; a bit culturist/nationalist for a leftwinger, so I'm not that offended by, say, Mike's views. Definitely against racial discrimination, but anti humanitarian immigration too. I'm not confused, I'm not a neo nazi. Neo nazis place a much heavier emphasis on ethnicity than I do. Anyway, this makes me a bit unpopular with modern day left wing. Old school working-class-left may have more sympathy for me than the overtly PC left youth. I respect queerfeminists, vegans and so on, but these should not replace trad leftwing themes and become the primary issues of modern socialist scene which too often seems to be the case with young socialists. Same with green party, in Finland. It has become more about genderqueer stuff than ecology related. Green party used to be green in 1990 or earlier, but now it appears to be a party for rich ppl who are a bit bisexual or feminist.
Identifying with "True Finns" party is not an option either because they are just bigoted. I'm homeless, except for Pirate Party. Too "bigot" (read: rational) for mainstream left, too hippie (read: open minded, egalitarian, tolerant) for True Finns. Trying to balance between pragmatism and idealism, which (either one) too many swallow right away without biting first, black-white thinking that is. Rather hated for what I am than loved for what I am not.
Think of the future, near future: the machine replaces the man. Half of jobs disappear, but the amount of humans on the planet grows. We can either be dumb and destroy the machines, or be smart and let the machines work for us and use socialist methods to share our resources since I guess we, humans, are supposed to work as a team.
Also, too much philosophy maybe, too little action. You can't even fart without it being some kind of queer-feminist statement, and taking a dump is considered dadaistic anarchoprimitivist art?
I personally am also an odd case; a bit culturist/nationalist for a leftwinger, so I'm not that offended by, say, Mike's views. Definitely against racial discrimination, but anti humanitarian immigration too. I'm not confused, I'm not a neo nazi. Neo nazis place a much heavier emphasis on ethnicity than I do. Anyway, this makes me a bit unpopular with modern day left wing. Old school working-class-left may have more sympathy for me than the overtly PC left youth. I respect queerfeminists, vegans and so on, but these should not replace trad leftwing themes and become the primary issues of modern socialist scene which too often seems to be the case with young socialists. Same with green party, in Finland. It has become more about genderqueer stuff than ecology related. Green party used to be green in 1990 or earlier, but now it appears to be a party for rich ppl who are a bit bisexual or feminist.
Identifying with "True Finns" party is not an option either because they are just bigoted. I'm homeless, except for Pirate Party. Too "bigot" (read: rational) for mainstream left, too hippie (read: open minded, egalitarian, tolerant) for True Finns. Trying to balance between pragmatism and idealism, which (either one) too many swallow right away without biting first, black-white thinking that is. Rather hated for what I am than loved for what I am not.
Think of the future, near future: the machine replaces the man. Half of jobs disappear, but the amount of humans on the planet grows. We can either be dumb and destroy the machines, or be smart and let the machines work for us and use socialist methods to share our resources since I guess we, humans, are supposed to work as a team.
Also, too much philosophy maybe, too little action. You can't even fart without it being some kind of queer-feminist statement, and taking a dump is considered dadaistic anarchoprimitivist art?
Re: Books you read
hummm sorry but you have to read the book mike is reading before commenting... And from our previus form discusion he proven to have ethnicity emphasis. I would definetly name him neo nazi in embrio stage. Not surprising, every time national economy is failing, ethnicity(or ethnic conflict) becomes "problem" because its the bourjuva propaganda to keep public attention away from their failings.
- Maximilian Lhoth
- Posts: 2871
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:05 am
- Location: 378093000
- Contact:
Re: Books you read
Yea, he is open about it, but my point was more like that there are different degrees of hardness in diff schools of national socialism, and that some schools are "less" evil than others. What I know about swedish national socialism of nowadays is what Mike has told me, but I can tell that it differs heavily from Finnish NS, which is harsher, and for sure very heavily from Russian NS, which is nauseatingly harsh. It appears that not all NS is the same, but there are "moderate" and non-violent / non-aggressive forms.Andoriel wrote:hummm sorry but you have to read the book mike is reading before commenting... And from our previus form discusion he proven to have ethnicity emphasis. I would definetly name him neo nazi in embrio stage. Not surprising, every time national economy is failing, ethnicity(or ethnic conflict) becomes "problem" because its the bourjuva propaganda to keep public attention away from their failings.
I'm not a specialist but it appears that the ethnicity emphasis is one of the things that define NS. Personally I am opposed to racial prejudice. Also in real life, even if opposed to humanitarian immigration generally, most often I actually end up being the "defense lawyer" for humanitarian immigrants. Especially young females tend to go mega bigot all the time they see arab or black guys, which sucks, it's like saying all punx are drunx, as "sXe" (former abuser, the typical story...) I find it annoying. They are here, now, let's treat them well. Another question is, how many more of them we "can" take, or if we could "save the world" more effectively using the same resources in a different way.
And yes I think it's easy to manipulate people into blaming humanitarian immigrants for this and that when in reality it's the white, "aryan" (lol) german banker, that is screwing .fi taxpayer's butthole.
One of my personal favorite unfavorite racist epic fail villain guy is Robert Mugabe, btw.
CLASS WAR, NOT RACE WAR (no violent class war please, but democratic class war)
http://sakutimonen.blogit.fi/suuri-puhallus/ -- about EU and Friedman, sadly in finnish only