Warriors
Moderator: Game Masters
Re: Warriors
Ricardus, play a warrior before spitting bullshit, 40 poisoning is only useful if you have someone with 100+ poisoning poison your weapons. Not sure what to answer to the rest because it's random non sense gibberish.
Re: Warriors
There were endless threads about Camping, Discordiante and whatnot ideas.Hilda wrote:Ricardus, play a warrior before spitting bullshit, 40 poisoning is only useful if you have someone with 100+ poisoning poison your weapons. Not sure what to answer to the rest because it's random non sense gibberish.
Yes, i agree with you - Warriors suck balls in majorly everything due to their healing. Mostly PvP because everything happens MUCH faster in PvP than their healing can hold.
current G-regen pots dont work as they should either. I already voted for 85 healing.
And i'd see the resist dropped also.
Here's another improvisation for 85 healing increase;
Remove Parrying from warriors completely
Remove Poisoning from warriors completely
Nerf resist to 65 or 40.
Here's your risk, you may be good in meelee - but you will be a onehit for casters.
Thats what we dont have in fighter section, but mostly in caster section - Balancing starts kicking in!
Last edited by Zaradon on Tue May 29, 2012 9:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Warriors
Warriors poisoning has never been about the actual poison / poison level. It's simply to delay your opponents healing. There's nothing more behind it.
Damage-wise the difference of 100 and 85 tactics is small compared to the gain of 65 and 85 healing. Don't matter how you look at it, but it's a fair deal. I think this is eventually a matter of how you see the class. If you PvP and you bet on damage, most likely 100/65 is the way to go. If you like to PvM, then surely 85/85 has more value.
Also, this isn't an ideas thread. Two options, talk about them if you wish.
- Boris
Damage-wise the difference of 100 and 85 tactics is small compared to the gain of 65 and 85 healing. Don't matter how you look at it, but it's a fair deal. I think this is eventually a matter of how you see the class. If you PvP and you bet on damage, most likely 100/65 is the way to go. If you like to PvM, then surely 85/85 has more value.
Also, this isn't an ideas thread. Two options, talk about them if you wish.
- Boris
Leather armor is best for sneaking, because it's literally made from hide.
Re: Warriors
Difference between 85 and 100 tactics cant be small. Ive been many times been instakilled by 100 tactics but not ever by 85.
- Johnny Walac
- Posts: 4503
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:05 pm
- Location: Sweden
Re: Warriors
Difference between 65 and 85 healing though is huge.
Re: Warriors
By warriors or barbarians?Simmo wrote:Difference between 85 and 100 tactics cant be small. Ive been many times been instakilled by 100 tactics but not ever by 85.
Re: Warriors
Ivan has instad me couple of times so is johnny. And when Johnny was nature warrior and i was hp with 180+hp with fully blessed nearly 100ar shit i got insta
-
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:28 pm
- Location: Winland
- Contact:
Re: Warriors
Johnny one shotted him last time. And Hilda once one shotted my fully blessed priest as a warrior.
Last edited by Darion al'Ferran on Tue May 29, 2012 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Warriors
The apply rate at 50 is freaking terrible.Boris wrote:Warriors poisoning has never been about the actual poison / poison level. It's simply to delay your opponents healing. There's nothing more behind it.
- Boris
Re: Warriors
Really? After testing 20 lessers, failed 3 with 40 Poisoning.Hilda wrote:The apply rate at 50 is freaking terrible.
- Boris
Leather armor is best for sneaking, because it's literally made from hide.