Robber Status

[Quintoz]

Okay so... we're talking robber status and other things here. I do remember Telborea changing between two guilds, same chars... one week they'd go robber guild, the next they would force punish crimes of people playing the game, claiming land as their own.

When robber status was implamented, I do believe everyone was warned that they could choose to continue staying a robber and get a .robber status, or rob no-more. Now you want to do both again or am I missing something?

Telborea never changed between 2 guilds to rob and then punish. Punishing non citizens has allways been what they do however becouse of rules we have to say "This is a robbery" or we get marks that's why it might confuse you. We switched from the Telborea to Legio guild becouse we changed our RP to fit pangaea better.

I allready said what we wanted out of the robber status change and linked exacly what was said from Boris. Becouse of a rule change making it harder and diffrent to change from robber to non-robber we want ONE chance to choose again becouse it makes things diffrent going from robber to non-robber.

So that makes it 2 wrongs right there.

[Mag'etherian]

You can troll all you want but Legio didn't even exist from the time I'm talking about. Every victim could say the same probably, who knows though, you may have a few in your pockets.

[Quintoz]

You don't have the information to discuss here so please save us all the time.

[Mag'etherian]

Stop reading if you don't like what you see. I do have the information I need. You guys had all the time you needed to switch from robber status, you ignored it. Welcome to the new world... months later.

[aldath c'om]

my case. turned red for ressing one tek once. added .robber tag by staff before i did reguest it. and now i cant get out of it? niiiice

[xHarlequinx]

I expected Quintoz to reply to me here so here it is... I'm not wrong in anything I said Quintard.

Forum jail please. This is inappropriate flaming.

Back on topic, I'd agree with Johnny, Onderho, and Bipina. If rules are changing on robber status (which it certainly looked like they are unless that was a Boris troll), it's only fair of those who designated themselves as robbers under the old roles have an option to change their flag as a one-time only.

[Monad]

Especially in a case like this where they informed something else from the start.

I don't even know what the point of this topic is? You're linking to some quote by Boris but what are you suggesting?
This is what we agreed on GM forums March 29:

To get off from robber status:

If the character is red

• - Salvation

If the character is blue or if the character is red and not planning to get salvation

• - Minimum of one month of being a robber (we need Wille to add timestamp to the .robberlist when they are added)
  - Public letter to general roleplay with statement of not a robber anymore and a gesture to compensate items to the victims

Have some of us said something contradictory to that somewhere?

[Johnny Walac]

This is what we agreed on GM forums March 29:

To get off from robber status:

If the character is red

• - Salvation

If the character is blue or if the character is red and not planning to get salvation

• - Minimum of one month of being a robber (we need Wille to add timestamp to the .robberlist when they are added)
  - Public letter to general roleplay with statement of not a robber anymore and a gesture to compensate items to the victims

Have some of us said something contradictory to that somewhere?

This, exactly. You made a huge change on the GM Forums without telling the playerbase. Almost 2 months after robber status was created. The robbers status was created 06 Feb where the staff suggested that if you didn't wanna be a .robber. They would remove it. About what you posted, nothing of the sort was said . The staff cannot make such rule changes without asking if we wanna stick being a robber. I can quote you many times where you say, the staff does not make huge changes without informing the playerbase?

"You're linking to some quote by Boris but what are you suggesting?"

Some quote? That is the quote of our Admin suggesting that if a .robber don't wanna be a .robber anymore. They would remove it. Now that you changed the rules. You should give that option to the .robbers one time. I'll contact you to fix some things then.

[Boris]

We can make it simple.

Tags can be removed by request till the end of this month. After new looting rules kicks in, it'll have to be removed by Law and only Law.

- Boris

[Monad]

This, exactly. You made a huge change on the GM Forums without telling the playerbase. Almost 2 months after robber status was created. The robbers status was created 06 Feb where the staff suggested that if you didn't wanna be a .robber. They would remove it. About what you posted, nothing of the sort was said . The staff cannot make such rule changes without asking if we wanna stick being a robber. I can quote you many times where you say, the staff does not make huge changes without informing the playerbase

You obviously didn't even read what I posted.

If the character is blue or if the character is red and not planning to get salvation
- Minimum of one month of being a robber (we need Wille to add timestamp to the .robberlist when they are added)
- Public letter to general roleplay with statement of not a robber anymore and a gesture to compensate items to the victims

So all you need to do is the make public RP letter. What's the hassle about?