A problem with the new rule

[Darian Darkmind]

what are you guys arguing about then?
we can fight back when reds come to attacks, ONLY in that same situation, without triggering a war.
but we can't initiate attacks by ourselves, that will trigger a war.
that seems fair imo.
well, i mean, not as fair as free for all as it should be, honestly, but atleast better than having blue guilds attacking reds all over the place

That exactly is the problem, you can make acts of war without triggering the war as long as you do it against reds as any red can be attacked for any reason and then killed and looted.

Defending yourself is a whole different thing. You can of course defend yourself if attacked by someone and should you win, you can loot him without triggering a war. But when you go hunting them down with a mob, when you aid their enemies and go look for vengeance and kill them and loot them, then that must trigger a war. Currently it doesn't.

[Zaradon]

But when you go hunting them down with a mob, when you aid their enemies and go look for vengeance and kill them and loot them, then that must trigger a war. Currently it doesn't.

Monad actually did mentoin that the staff will automatically start the war from the side going on the mass raids against the attacking/red side.

[Glarundis]

yeah.
i think reds don't have to be worried about that.
if blues continuously initiate attacks against red guild, they'll be at war