Lances

If you want to know the community’s opinion about a topic, make a poll here.

Moderator: Game Masters

Wich version do you prefer?

As it is now (high variance in dmg, dismounts)
27
61%
Updated version (low variance in dmg, does not dismount)
17
39%
 
Total votes: 44

User avatar
Boris
Admin
Posts: 6972
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:55 pm
Contact:

Lances

Post by Boris »

At the moment a lance can hit harder than a maul, but the variance of its dmg is big. It can also dismount.

There are 4 factors to this weapon, wich makes it very hard to balance. If we take out 1 factor (dismounting), we can focus on the 3 remaining factors (dmg, speed, skill.req.). As an update, I would make Lances very much a like compared to halberds/mauls, so they would deal big damage with simular damage modifiers. There's no need to change the speed of lances, as they're slow already.

So a simple question, wich version do you prefer?

- Boris
Leather armor is best for sneaking, because it's literally made from hide.
Simmo
Posts: 2681
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 4:56 pm

Re: Lances

Post by Simmo »

Just stay like they are?
Jon
Posts: 672
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 8:02 am

Re: Lances

Post by Jon »

Ye, stay as it is.
301232544
User avatar
Johnny Walac
Posts: 4503
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Lances

Post by Johnny Walac »

Removing dismount for Maul damage? Hell yeah. No doubt.

The Lance damage got lower average damage due to long damage range. A stable weapon like Maul for a Fencer would be golden.
Image
Order of Nature - Telborea- The Britannian Trade Union - ICQ: 434212709
PvP Video 1
PvP Video 2
User avatar
Glarundis
Posts: 5741
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Lances

Post by Glarundis »

i agree with johnny here.
dismount is a good thing, but if it does that rarely and the damage variations are too wide...
Demian
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:34 pm

Re: Lances

Post by Demian »

I voted to keep it as it is, but if it were made to be the same damage and speed as a maul, I will vote on that option.
User avatar
Zaradon
Posts: 4757
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:57 pm
Location: Estonia
Contact:

Re: Lances

Post by Zaradon »

The weapon has a bit of too high edge in the PvP world.

My vote goes on the no dismounting.
Simmo
Posts: 2681
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 4:56 pm

Re: Lances

Post by Simmo »

Atm we have to choose between;
Sometimes instakilling m00l vs sometimes dropping lance and then killing jons ass. I would see mool more op than lance atm.
Jon
Posts: 672
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 8:02 am

Re: Lances

Post by Jon »

First of all, at the moment lance with 160 dexterity is slower than a maul with 100 dex. As it's said before at the moment lance's damage range is pretty big and the top damage is higher with a lance. Lance is pretty much pvp weapon. With these changes all i can see is you trying to make it more for pvm also...for who? I think archers can handle pvm with bows, assassins can't hunt and i bet there are still better weapons for barbarians.

If this happens, i see this as a nerf for fencers. Also the change should include swing speed boost, not only damage range reducing.
And then we got pretty much two similar weapons...
301232544
User avatar
Boris
Admin
Posts: 6972
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Lances

Post by Boris »

Basicly it's a matter of better dmg vs. dismounting. Dismounting is so rare, I'd rather choose the better dmg.

So, I don't see this as a nerf from any perspective - unless you rely on dismouting everytime you fight with a lance.

- Boris
Leather armor is best for sneaking, because it's literally made from hide.
Post Reply