Mag'etherian wrote:Tekstone does not hate blues... they just want to rule the world in a perfect world. Your natural enemies, sure... just any random blue? Why would you even ask about that? Why am I even replying to this?
Oh there are many blues that we got a reason to stone. Don't worry about that.
My point was. It shouldn't be easy to stone because it's a powerful rite.
It's a powerful rite that could help cleanse this shard with people living in a fantasy world that robbers or even any red in general should have a live happily ever after life. If there's a reason for stoning blues, say they are fighting alongside your enemy, you should be able to stone them ... no questions asked. If it's pure metagaming, eat shit.
Johnny Walac wrote:My point was. Religions can't go dirty and do it.
They can in a risk of piety drop to 10 for the caster and concentrators.
yeah, but how can it be proven that it was religion x that did it?
if gm's didn't see it, any religion can deny it..
You should check the definition of risk.
Also if you type .online and you don't see GM's it doesn't mean we aren't necessary online.
Your question could be applied to lot of wrongdoings what religion characters are able to do but they are not allowed to.
So I'm not really sure what you're trying to point out?